5
program roles
3
steering roles
3
organizing roles
2
leadership roles
31
collaborators
2003–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
14 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more | TQC 2026 | regular | Jonathan Allcock, ▸João Fernando Doriguello, Gabor Ivanyos |
Bell sampling is a simple yet powerful tool based on measuring two copies of a quantum state in the Bell basis, and has found applications in a plethora of problems related to stabiliser states and measures of magic. However, it was not known how to generalise the procedure from qubits to $d$-level systems -- qudits -- for all dimensions $d > 2$ in a useful way. Indeed, a prior work of the authors (arXiv'24) showed that the natural extension of Bell sampling to arbitrary dimensions fails to provide meaningful information about the quantum states being measured. In this paper, we overcome the difficulties encountered in previous works and develop a useful generalisation of Bell sampling to qudits of all dimensions $d\geq 2$. At the heart of our primitive is a new unitary, based on Lagrange's four-square theorem, that maps four copies of any stabiliser state $|\mathcal{S}\rangle$ to four copies of its complex conjugate $|\mathcal{S}^\ast\rangle$ (up to some Pauli operator), which may be of independent interest. We then demonstrate the utility of our new Bell sampling technique by lifting several known results from qubits to qudits for any $d\geq 2$ (which involves working with submodules instead of subspaces): 1. Learning an unknown stabiliser state $|\mathcal{S}\rangle\in(\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes n}$ in $O(n^3)$ time with $O(n)$ samples; 2. Solving the Hidden Stabiliser Group Problem (a stabiliser version of the State Hidden Subgroup Problem) in $\widetilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ time with $\widetilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ samples; 3. Testing whether $|\psi\rangle\in(\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes n}$ has stabiliser size (a generalisation of stabiliser dimension for submodules) at least $d^t$ or is $\varepsilon$-far from all such states in $\widetilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ time with $\widetilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ samples if $\varepsilon = O(d^{-2})$; 4. Testing whether $|\psi\rangle\in(\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes n}$ is Haar-random or the output of a Clifford circuit augmented with less than $n/2$ single-qudit non-Clifford gates in $O(n^3)$ time using $O(n)$ samples. As a corollary, we show that Clifford circuits with at most $n/2$ single-qudit non-Clifford gates cannot prepare pseudorandom states, an exponential improvement over previous works; 5. Testing whether $|\psi\rangle\in(\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes n}$ has stabiliser fidelity at least $1-\varepsilon_1$ or at most $1-\varepsilon_2$ with $O(d^2/\varepsilon_2)$ samples if $\varepsilon_1 = 0$ or $O(d^2/\varepsilon_2^2)$ samples if $\varepsilon_1 = O(d^{-2})$. |
|||
| Quasi-quantum states and the quasi-quantum PCP theorem | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Itai Arad |
| On the quantum time complexity of divide and conquer | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Jonathan Allcock, Jinge Bao, Aleksandrs Belovs, Troy Lee |
|
Constant-depth circuits for Uniformly Controlled Gates and Boolean functions with application to quantum memory circuits ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Jonathan Allcock, Jinge Bao, João Fernando Doriguello, Alessandro Luongo |
We explore the power of the unbounded Fan-Out gate and the Global Tunable gates generated by Ising-type Hamiltonians in constructing constant-depth quantum circuits, with particular attention to quantum memory devices. We propose two types of constant-depth constructions for implementing Uniformly Controlled Gates. These gates include the Fan-In gates defined by x>|b> —> |x>|b+ f(x)> for x in 0,1^n and b in 0,1, where f is a Boolean function. The first of our constructions is based on computing the one-hot encoding of the control register |x>, while the second is based on Boolean analysis and exploits different representations of f such as its Fourier expansion. Via these constructions, we obtain constant-depth circuits for the quantum counterparts of read-only and read-write memory devices — Quantum Random Access Memory (QRAM) and Quantum Random Access Gate (QRAG) — of memory size n. The implementation based on one-hot encoding requires either O(n log(n)łogłog(n)) ancillae and O(n log(n)) Fan-Out gates or O(n log(n)) ancillae and 6 Global Tunable gates. On the other hand, the implementation based on Boolean analysis requires only 2 Global Tunable gates at the expense of O(n^2) ancillae. |
|||
| Quantum Algorithm for Stochastic Optimal Stopping Problems with Applications in Finance | TQC 2022 | regular | João Fernando Doriguello, Alessandro Luongo, Jinge Bao, Patrick Rebentrost |
| Quantum algorithms for graph problems with cut queries | QIP 2021 | regular | Troy Lee, Shengyu Zhang |
Abstract Let $G$ be an $n$-vertex graph with $m$ edges. When asked a subset $S$ of vertices, a cut query on $G$ returns the number of edges of $G$ that have exactly one endpoint in $S$. We show that there is a bounded-error quantum algorithm that determines all connected components of $G$ after making $O(\log(n)^6)$ many cut queries. In contrast, it follows from results in communication complexity that any randomized algorithm even just to decide whether the graph is connected or not must make at least $\Omega(n/\log(n))$ many cut queries. We further show that with $O(\log(n)^8)$ many cut queries a quantum algorithm can with high probability output a spanning forest for $G$. En route to proving these results, we design quantum algorithms for learning a graph using cut queries. We show that a quantum algorithm can learn a graph with maximum degree $d$ after $O(d \log(n)^2)$ many cut queries, and can learn a general graph with $O(\sqrt{m} \log(n)^{3/2})$ many cut queries. These two upper bounds are tight up to the poly-logarithmic factors, and compare to $\Omega(dn)$ and $\Omega(m/\log(n))$ lower bounds on the number of cut queries needed by a randomized algorithm for the same problems, respectively. The key ingredients in our results are the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm, approximate counting with ``OR queries'', and learning sparse vectors from inner products as in compressed sensing. |
|||
| Efficient quantum algorithms for some instances of the hidden multiple shift problem | QIP 2019 | regular | Gabor Ivanyos, ▸Anupam Prakash |
| Separations in communication complexity using cheat sheets and information complexity | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Anurag Anshu, Aleksandrs Belovs, Shalev Ben-David, Mika Goos, Rahul Jain, Robin Kothari, Troy Lee |
| Separations in Query Complexity Based on Pointer Functions | QIP 2016 | plenary | ▸Andris Ambainis, Kaspars Balodis, Aleksandrs Belovs, Troy Lee, Juris Smotrovs |
|
“Improved Quantum Query Algorithms for Triangle Finding and Associativity Testing.” | Lecture | | ↗
|
QIP 2013 | regular | Troy Lee, Frédéric Magniez |
| Hidden Symmetry Subgroup Problems | QIP 2012 | regular | Thomas Decker, Gabor Ivanyos, Pawel Wocjan |
|
On the power of a unique quantum witness ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Rahul Jain, Iordanis Kerenidis, Greg Kuperberg, Or Sattath, Shengyu Zhang |
| An efficient quantum algorithm for the hidden subgroup problem in nil-2 groups | QIP 2008 | regular | ▸Gabor Ivanyos, Luc Sanselme |
| Hidden translation and orbit coset in quantum computing | QIP 2003 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
5 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more | QIP 2026 | Jonathan Allcock, ▸João Fernando Doriguello, Gabor Ivanyos |
| Beyond Bell sampling: stabilizer state learning and quantum pseudorandomness lower bounds on qudits | QIP 2025 | Jonathan Allcock, João Fernando Doriguello, Gabor Ivanyos |
| Constant-depth circuits for Uniformly Controlled Gates and Boolean functions with application to quantum memory circuits | QIP 2024 | Jonathan Allcock, Jinge Bao, João Fernando Doriguello, Alessandro Luongo |
| Strategies for quantum races | QIP 2019 | Troy Lee, Maharshi Ray |
| Quantum generalizations of the polynomial hierarchy with applications to QMA(2) | QIP 2019 | Sevag Gharibian, Jamie Sikora, Aarthi Sundaram, Justin Yirka |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2015 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2014 | organizing | member | — |
| QIP 2011 | organizing | member | — |
| TQC 2011 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2010 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2007 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2006 | organizing | chair | — |
| QIP 2006 | program | chair | — |
| QIP 2006 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2004 | steering | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Gabor Ivanyos | 6 |
| Jonathan Allcock | 6 |
| João Fernando Doriguello | 6 |
| Troy Lee | 6 |
| Jinge Bao | 4 |
| Aleksandrs Belovs | 3 |
| Alessandro Luongo | 3 |
| Rahul Jain | 2 |
| Shengyu Zhang | 2 |
| Aarthi Sundaram | 1 |
| Andris Ambainis | 1 |
| Anupam Prakash | 1 |
| Anurag Anshu | 1 |
| Frédéric Magniez | 1 |
| Greg Kuperberg | 1 |
| Iordanis Kerenidis | 1 |
| Itai Arad | 1 |
| Jamie Sikora | 1 |
| Juris Smotrovs | 1 |
| Justin Yirka | 1 |