7
collaborators
2008–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
4 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more | TQC 2026 | regular | Jonathan Allcock, ▸João Fernando Doriguello, Miklos Santha |
Bell sampling is a simple yet powerful tool based on measuring two copies of a quantum state in the Bell basis, and has found applications in a plethora of problems related to stabiliser states and measures of magic. However, it was not known how to generalise the procedure from qubits to $d$-level systems -- qudits -- for all dimensions $d > 2$ in a useful way. Indeed, a prior work of the authors (arXiv'24) showed that the natural extension of Bell sampling to arbitrary dimensions fails to provide meaningful information about the quantum states being measured. In this paper, we overcome the difficulties encountered in previous works and develop a useful generalisation of Bell sampling to qudits of all dimensions $d\geq 2$. At the heart of our primitive is a new unitary, based on Lagrange's four-square theorem, that maps four copies of any stabiliser state $|\mathcal{S}\rangle$ to four copies of its complex conjugate $|\mathcal{S}^\ast\rangle$ (up to some Pauli operator), which may be of independent interest. We then demonstrate the utility of our new Bell sampling technique by lifting several known results from qubits to qudits for any $d\geq 2$ (which involves working with submodules instead of subspaces): 1. Learning an unknown stabiliser state $|\mathcal{S}\rangle\in(\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes n}$ in $O(n^3)$ time with $O(n)$ samples; 2. Solving the Hidden Stabiliser Group Problem (a stabiliser version of the State Hidden Subgroup Problem) in $\widetilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ time with $\widetilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ samples; 3. Testing whether $|\psi\rangle\in(\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes n}$ has stabiliser size (a generalisation of stabiliser dimension for submodules) at least $d^t$ or is $\varepsilon$-far from all such states in $\widetilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ time with $\widetilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ samples if $\varepsilon = O(d^{-2})$; 4. Testing whether $|\psi\rangle\in(\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes n}$ is Haar-random or the output of a Clifford circuit augmented with less than $n/2$ single-qudit non-Clifford gates in $O(n^3)$ time using $O(n)$ samples. As a corollary, we show that Clifford circuits with at most $n/2$ single-qudit non-Clifford gates cannot prepare pseudorandom states, an exponential improvement over previous works; 5. Testing whether $|\psi\rangle\in(\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes n}$ has stabiliser fidelity at least $1-\varepsilon_1$ or at most $1-\varepsilon_2$ with $O(d^2/\varepsilon_2)$ samples if $\varepsilon_1 = 0$ or $O(d^2/\varepsilon_2^2)$ samples if $\varepsilon_1 = O(d^{-2})$. |
|||
| Efficient quantum algorithms for some instances of the hidden multiple shift problem | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Anupam Prakash, Miklos Santha |
| Hidden Symmetry Subgroup Problems | QIP 2012 | regular | Thomas Decker, Miklos Santha, Pawel Wocjan |
| An efficient quantum algorithm for the hidden subgroup problem in nil-2 groups | QIP 2008 | regular ▸ presenter | Luc Sanselme, Miklos Santha |
2 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more | QIP 2026 | Jonathan Allcock, ▸João Fernando Doriguello, Miklos Santha |
| Beyond Bell sampling: stabilizer state learning and quantum pseudorandomness lower bounds on qudits | QIP 2025 | Jonathan Allcock, João Fernando Doriguello, Miklos Santha |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Miklos Santha | 6 |
| Jonathan Allcock | 3 |
| João Fernando Doriguello | 3 |
| Anupam Prakash | 1 |
| Luc Sanselme | 1 |
| Pawel Wocjan | 1 |
| Thomas Decker | 1 |