25
talks
2
posters
12
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2008–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum speedups in solving near-symmetric optimization problems by low-depth QAOA | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Leo Zhou |
| Testing quantum satisfiability | QIP 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Changpeng Shao, Dominic Verdon |
| Phasecraft - The Quantum Algorithms Company | QIP 2024 | invited ▸ presenter | Toby Cubitt |
| Quantum query complexity of functions of matrices | QIP 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Changpeng Shao |
| Solving boolean satisfiability problems with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm | QIP 2023 | regular | ▸Sami Boulebnane |
| Quantum speedups for solving linear regression problems | QIP 2023 | regular | ▸Changpeng Shao |
| Towards near-term quantum simulation of materials | TQC 2023 | regular | Laura Clinton, Toby Cubitt, Brian Flynn, Filippo Maria Gambetta, ▸Joel Klassen, Stephen Piddock, Raul Santos, Evan Sheridan |
The limiting constraint on simulating materials on near-term quantum hardware is the requisite circuit depths and qubit numbers, with current estimates placing them well beyond near-term capabilities. A critical subroutine of simulation algorithms is implementing a layer of unitary evolutions by each local term in the Hamiltonian. In this work we develop a new quantum algorithm which dramatically reduces the estimated cost of material simulations using this subroutine, improving circuit depths by up to 6 orders of magnitude for Strontium Vanadate, for example. We achieve this by introducing a fermionic encoding that leverages the locality of materials Hamiltonians describing an active space in the Wannier basis. This design generates quantum circuits whose depth is independent of the system’s size. |
|||
| Quantum algorithms for learning graphs | QIP 2021 | regular | Changpeng Shao |
We study the problem of learning an unknown graph provided via an oracle using a quantum algorithm. We consider three query models. In the first model (``OR queries''), the oracle returns whether a given subset of the vertices contains any edges. In the second (``parity queries''), the oracle returns the parity of the number of edges in a subset. In the third model, we are given copies of the graph state corresponding to the graph. We give quantum algorithms that achieve speedups over the best possible classical algorithms in the OR and parity query models, for some families of graphs, and give quantum algorithms in the graph state model whose complexity is similar to the parity query model. For some parameter regimes, the speedups can be exponential in the parity query model. On the other hand, without any promise on the graph, no speedup is possible in the OR query model. A main technique we use is the quantum algorithm for solving the combinatorial group testing problem, for which a query-efficient quantum algorithm was given by Belovs. Here we additionally give a time-efficient quantum algorithm for this problem, based on the algorithm of Ambainis et al.\ for a ``gapped" version of the group testing problem. We also give simple time-efficient quantum algorithms based on Fourier sampling and amplitude amplification for learning the exact-half and majority functions, which almost match the optimal complexity of Belovs' algorithms. |
|||
| Quantum majority and other Boolean functions with quantum inputs | QIP 2021 | regular | Harry Buhrman, Noah Linden, Laura Mančinska, Maris Ozols |
Abstract Majority vote is a basic method for amplifying correct outcomes that is widely used in computer science and beyond. It can, for example, be used to amplify the correctness of a quantum device whose output is classical. However, when the output of a device is a quantum state, it is not apriori clear how to implement an analogous \emph{quantum} majority vote. To this end, we consider an extension of majority vote to quantum inputs and outputs: given a product state of the form $\ket{\phi_1, \phi_2, \dotsc ,\phi_n}$ where each qubit $\ket{\phi_i}$ is in one of two orthogonal states $\ket{\psi_0}$ or $\ket{\psi_1}$, output the majority state $\ket{\psi_0}$ or $\ket{\psi_1}$. We provide an optimal algorithm for this problem that achieves worst-case fidelity of $1/2 + \Theta(1/\sqrt{n})$. Under the promise that at least $2/3$ of the qubits are in the majority state, the fidelity increases to $1 - \Theta(1/n)$ and approaches one in the limit. More generally, we initiate the study of covariant and symmetric Boolean functions $f: \set{0,1^n} \to \set{0,1}$ with quantum inputs and outputs. We provide a simple linear program of size roughly $n/2$ for computing the optimal worst-case fidelity and show that a generalization of our algorithm is optimal for computing $f$. Our algorithm has complexity $O(n^4 \log n)$ where $n$ is the number of qubits. |
|||
| Quantum-accelerated multilevel Monte Carlo methods for stochastic differential equations in mathematical finance | TQC 2021 | regular | Dong An, Noah Linden, Jin-Peng Liu, Changpeng Shao, Jiasu Wang |
| Faster quantum-inspired algorithms for solving linear systems | TQC 2021 | regular | Changpeng Shao |
| Exponential quantum communication reductions from generalizations of the Boolean Hidden Matching problem | TQC 2020 | regular | João Fernando Doriguello |
| Ashley Montanaro (Bristol) | TQC 2019 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Classical boson sampling algorithms and the outlook for experimental boson sampling | QIP 2018 | plenary | ▸Alex Neville, Chris Sparrow, Raphael Clifford, Eric Johnston, Patrick Birchall, Anthony Laing, Peter Clifford |
| Universal Qudit Hamiltonians | TQC 2018 | regular | Stephen Piddock |
| Universal quantum Hamiltonians | QIP 2017 | regular | Toby Cubitt, ▸Stephen Piddock |
| Sequential measurements, disturbance and property testing | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Aram Harrow, Cedric Lin |
| Quantum walk speedup of backtracking algorithms | QIP 2016 | regular ▸ presenter | — |
| Average-case complexity versus approximate simulation of commuting quantum computations | QIP 2016 | regular | ▸Michael Bremner, Daniel Shepherd |
| Quantum pattern matching fast on average | QIP 2015 | regular | — |
| Classification of the complexity of local Hamiltonian problems | QIP 2014 | regular ▸ presenter | Toby Cubitt |
|
“Weak multiplicativity for random quantum channels.” ↗
|
QIP 2013 | invited | — |
|
An efficient test for product states, with applications to quantum Merlin-Arthur games ↗
|
QIP 2011 | plenary | — |
| Quantum boolean functions | QIP 2009 | regular ▸ presenter | Tobias J. Osborne |
| Counterexamples to additivity of minimum output p-Renyi entropy for p close to 0 | QIP 2008 | regular | ▸Toby Cubitt, Aram Harrow, Debbie Leung, Andreas Winter |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum Phase Estimation without Controlled Unitaries | QIP 2025 | Raul Garcia-Patron Sanchez, Laura Clinton, Toby Cubitt, Maarten Stroeks |
| Quantum search of partially ordered sets | QIP 2008 | — |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2024 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2023 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2022 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2021 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2020 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2019 | SC | member | — |
| QIP 2018 | SC | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2017 | SC | member | — |
| QIP 2015 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2014 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2013 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Changpeng Shao | 6 |
| Toby Cubitt | 6 |
| Stephen Piddock | 3 |
| Aram Harrow | 2 |
| Laura Clinton | 2 |
| Noah Linden | 2 |
| Alex Neville | 1 |
| Andreas Winter | 1 |
| Anthony Laing | 1 |
| Brian Flynn | 1 |
| Cedric Lin | 1 |
| Chris Sparrow | 1 |
| Daniel Shepherd | 1 |
| Debbie Leung | 1 |
| Dominic Verdon | 1 |
| Dong An | 1 |
| Eric Johnston | 1 |
| Evan Sheridan | 1 |
| Filippo Maria Gambetta | 1 |
| Harry Buhrman | 1 |