4
program roles
66
collaborators
2013–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
13 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| An infinite hierarchy of multi-copy quantum learning tasks | QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Jan Nöller, Viet Tran, Mariami Gachechildaze |
Learning properties of quantum states from measurement data is a fundamental challenge in quantum information. The sample complexity of such tasks depends crucially on the measurement primitive. While shadow tomography achieves sample- efficient learning by allowing entangling measurements across many copies, it requires prohibitively deep circuits. At the other extreme, two-copy measurements already yield exponential advantages over single-copy strategies in tasks such as Pauli tomography. In this work we show that such sharp separations extend far beyond the two-copy regime: for every prime k we construct explicit learning tasks of degree k, which are exponentially hard with (k − 1)-copy measurements but efficiently solvable with k- copy measurements. Our protocols are not only sample-efficient but also realizable with shallow circuits. Extending further, we show that such finite-degree tasks ex- ist for all square-free integers k, pointing toward a general principle underlying their existence. Together, our results reveal an infinite hierarchy of multi-copy learning prob- lems, uncovering new phase transitions in sample complexity and underscoring the role of reliable quantum memory as a key resource for exponential quantum advantage |
|||
| Classical shadows | TQC 2023 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems | QIP 2022 | plenary_long | ▸Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Giacomo Torlai, Victor Albert, John Preskill |
| Fundamental aspects of solving quantum problems with machine learning | QIP 2021 | regular | Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Michael Broughton, Masoud Mohseni, Ryan Babbush, Sergio Boixo, Hartmut Neven, Jarrod McClean, John Preskill |
Abstract Machine learning (ML) provides the potential to solve challenging quantum many-body problems in physics and chemistry. Yet, this prospect has not been fully justified. In this work, we establish rigorous results to understand the power of classical ML and the potential for quantum advantage in an important example application: predicting outcomes of quantum mechanical processes. We prove that for achieving a small average prediction error, one can always design a classical ML model whose sample complexity is comparable to the best quantum ML model (up to a small polynomial factor). Regarding computational complexity, we show that the class of problems that can be solved by efficient classical ML models with access to sampled data is strictly larger than BPP. Hence, classical ML models may be able to solve some challenging quantum problems after training from data obtained in physical experiments. As a concrete example, we prove that a simple, classical ML model can efficiently learn to predict ground state representations that approximate expectation values of local observables up to a small, constant error. This holds for any smooth family of gapped local Hamiltonians in a finite spatial dimension. |
|||
| Efficient estimation of Pauli observables by derandomization | TQC 2021 | regular | ▸Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, John Preskill |
| Quantum simulation with randomized product formulas: A concentration analysis | TQC 2021 | regular | ▸Chi-Fang Chen, Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Joel Tropp |
| Fast and robust quantum state tomography from few basis measurements | TQC 2021 | regular | Daniel Stilck França, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão |
| Models of quantum complexity growth | QIP 2020 | regular | Nicholas Hunter-Jones, Wissam Chemissany, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, John Preskill |
| Predicting Features of Quantum Systems using Classical Shadows | QIP 2020 | regular | Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang |
| Models of quantum complexity growth | TQC 2020 | regular | ▸Nicholas Hunter-Jones, Wissam Chemissany, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, John Preskill |
The concept of quantum complexity has far-reaching implications spanning theoretical computer science, quantum many-body physics, and high energy physics. The quantum complexity of a unitary transformation or quantum state is defined as the size of the shortest quantum computation that executes the unitary or prepares the state. It is reasonable to expect that the complexity of a quantum state governed by a chaotic many-body Hamiltonian grows linearly with time for a time that is exponential in the system size; however, because it is hard to rule out a short-cut that improves the efficiency of a computation, it is notoriously difficult to derive lower bounds on quantum complexity for particular unitaries or states without making additional assumptions. To go further, one may study more generic models of complexity growth. We provide a rigorous connection between complexity growth and unitary k-designs, ensembles which capture the randomness of the unitary group. This connection allows us to leverage existing results about design growth to draw conclusions about the growth of complexity. We prove that local random quantum circuits generate unitary transformations whose complexity grows linearly for a long time, mirroring the behavior one expects in chaotic quantum systems and verifying conjectures by Brown and Susskind. Moreover, our results apply under a strong definition of quantum complexity based on optimal distinguishing measurements. |
|||
| Faster quantum and classical SDP approximations for quadratic binary optimization | TQC 2020 | regular | ▸Daniel Stilck França, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão |
We give a quantum speedup for solving the canonical semidefinite programming relaxation for binary quadratic optimization. The class of relaxations for combinatorial optimization has so far eluded quantum speedups. Our methods combine ideas from quantum Gibbs sampling and matrix exponent updates. A de-quantization of the algorithm also leads to a faster classical solver. For generic instances, our quantum solver gives a nearly quadratic speedup over state-of-the-art algorithms. We also provide an efficient randomized rounding procedure that converts approximately optimal SDP solutions into constant factor approximations of the original quadratic optimization problem. |
|||
| Recovering quantum gates from few average gate fidelities | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Ingo Roth, Shelby Kimmel, Yi-Kai Liu, David Gross, Jens Eisert, Martin Kliesch |
| Guaranteed recovery of quantum processes from few measurements | TQC 2017 | regular | Martin Kliesch, Jens Eisert, David Gross |
18 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Classical Design Techniques for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits | QIP 2025 | Tom Peham, Ludwig Schmid, Nina Brandl, Lucas Berent, Lukas Burgholzer, Markus Müller, Robert Wille |
| Observation of the Entanglement Barrier with Classical Shadows | QIP 2023 | Aniket Rath, Vittorio Vitale, Sara Murciano, Matteo Votto, Jerome Dubail, Cyril Branciard, Pasquale Calabrese, Benoit Vermersch |
| Transition states and greedy exploration of the QAOA optimization landscape | QIP 2023 | Raimel A. Medina Ramos, Stefan Sack, Maksym Serbyn |
| Avoiding barren plateaus using classical shadows | QIP 2023 | Stefan Sack, Raimel Medina, Alexios Michailidis, Maksym Serbyn |
| Quantum mean states are nicer than you think: fast algorithms to compute states maximizing average fidelity | TQC 2023 | Afham, Christopher Ferrie |
| Quantum simulation via randomized product formulas: A concentration analysis | QIP 2021 | Chi-Fang Chen, Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Joel A. Tropp. |
| Randomizing multi-product formulas for improved Hamiltonian simulation | QIP 2021 | Paul K. Fährmann, Mark Steudtner, Mária Kieferová, Jens Eisert |
| Randomizing multi-product formulas for improved Hamiltonian simulation | TQC 2021 | Paul K. Fährmann, Mark Steudtner, Mária Kieferová, Jens Eisert |
| Faster quantum and classical SDP approximations for quadratic binary optimization | QIP 2020 | Daniel Stilck França, Fernando G.S L. Brand ̃ao |
| Explaining quantum correlations through evolution of causal models | QIP 2017 | Robin Harper, Robert Chapman, Christopher Ferrie, Christopher E. Granade, Daniel Naoumenko, Steven Flammia, Alberto Peruzzo |
| The Clifford group fails gracefully to be a unitary 4-design (with applications to state distinguishability, entropic uncertainties, and phase retrieval) | QIP 2017 | Huangjun Zhu, Markus Grassl, David Gross |
| Certifying linear optical circuits via phaseless estimation techniques | QIP 2016 | Daniel Suess, David Gross |
| Improving compressed sensing with the diamond norm | QIP 2016 | Martin Kliesch, Jens Eisert, David Gross |
In low-rank matrix recovery, one aims to reconstruct a low-rank matrix from a minimal number of linear measurements. Within the paradigm of compressed sensing, this is made computationally efficient by minimizing the nuclear norm as a convex surrogate for rank. In this work, we identify an improved regularizer based on the so-called diamond norm, a concept imported from quantum information theory. We show that -for a class of matrices saturating a certain norm inequality- the descent cone of the diamond norm is contained in that of the nuclear norm. This suggests superior reconstruction properties for these matrices. We explicitly characterize this set of matrices, which also contains quantum channels. Moreover, we demonstrate numerically that the diamond norm indeed outperforms the nuclear norm in a number of relevant applications: These include not only the task of quantum process tomography but also signal analysis tasks such as blind matrix deconvolution or the retrieval of certain unitary basis changes. The diamond norm is defined for matrices that can be interpreted as order-4 tensors and it turns out that the above condition depends crucially on that tensorial structure. In this sense, this work touches on an aspect of the notoriously difficult tensor completion problem. |
||
| Improving compressed sensing with the diamond norm | TQC 2016 | Martin Kliesch, Jens Eisert, David Gross |
| A unifying framework for relaxations of the causal assumptions in Bell's theorem | QIP 2015 | Rafael Chaves, Jonatan Bohr Brask, David Gross |
| Low rank quantum state tomography from rank-one measurements | QIP 2015 | Ulrich Terstiege, Holger Rauhut, David Gross |
| Signal Reconstruction from Quadratic Measurements Using Quantum t-Designs | QIP 2014 | David Gross, Felix Krahmer |
| Stabilizer states are spherical 3-designs – with applications to quantum state distinguishability | QIP 2013 | David Gross |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2025 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2025 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2022 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| David Gross | 10 |
| Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang | 6 |
| Jens Eisert | 6 |
| John Preskill | 5 |
| Fernando G. S. L. Brandão | 4 |
| Martin Kliesch | 4 |
| Daniel Stilck França | 3 |
| Chi-Fang Chen | 2 |
| Christopher Ferrie | 2 |
| Maksym Serbyn | 2 |
| Mark Steudtner | 2 |
| Mária Kieferová | 2 |
| Nicholas Hunter-Jones | 2 |
| Paul K. Fährmann | 2 |
| Stefan Sack | 2 |
| Wissam Chemissany | 2 |
| Afham | 1 |
| Alberto Peruzzo | 1 |
| Alexios Michailidis | 1 |
| Aniket Rath | 1 |