13
talks
1
posters
4
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2017–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| An infinite hierarchy of multi-copy quantum learning tasks | QIP 2026 | regular | Jan Nöller, Viet Tran, Mariami Gachechildaze |
Learning properties of quantum states from measurement data is a fundamental
challenge in quantum information. The sample complexity of such tasks depends
crucially on the measurement primitive. While shadow tomography achieves sample-
efficient learning by allowing entangling measurements across many copies, it requires
prohibitively deep circuits. At the other extreme, two-copy measurements already yield
exponential advantages over single-copy strategies in tasks such as Pauli tomography.
In this work we show that such sharp separations extend far beyond the two-copy
regime: for every prime k we construct explicit learning tasks of degree k, which are
exponentially hard with (k − 1)-copy measurements but efficiently solvable with k-
copy measurements. Our protocols are not only sample-efficient but also realizable
with shallow circuits. Extending further, we show that such finite-degree tasks ex-
ist for all square-free integers k, pointing toward a general principle underlying their
existence. Together, our results reveal an infinite hierarchy of multi-copy learning prob-
lems, uncovering new phase transitions in sample complexity and underscoring the role
of reliable quantum memory as a key resource for exponential quantum advantage |
|||
| Classical shadows | TQC 2023 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems | QIP 2022 | plenary_long | ▸Hsin-Yuan Huang, Giacomo Torlai, Victor Albert, John Preskill |
| Fundamental aspects of solving quantum problems with machine learning | QIP 2021 | regular | Hsin-Yuan Huang, Michael Broughton, Masoud Mohseni, Ryan Babbush, Sergio Boixo, Hartmut Neven, Jarrod McClean, John Preskill |
Abstract Machine learning (ML) provides the potential to solve challenging quantum many-body problems in physics and chemistry. Yet, this prospect has not been fully justified. In this work, we establish rigorous results to understand the power of classical ML and the potential for quantum advantage in an important example application: predicting outcomes of quantum mechanical processes. We prove that for achieving a small average prediction error, one can always design a classical ML model whose sample complexity is comparable to the best quantum ML model (up to a small polynomial factor). Regarding computational complexity, we show that the class of problems that can be solved by efficient classical ML models with access to sampled data is strictly larger than BPP. Hence, classical ML models may be able to solve some challenging quantum problems after training from data obtained in physical experiments. As a concrete example, we prove that a simple, classical ML model can efficiently learn to predict ground state representations that approximate expectation values of local observables up to a small, constant error. This holds for any smooth family of gapped local Hamiltonians in a finite spatial dimension. |
|||
| Efficient estimation of Pauli observables by derandomization | TQC 2021 | regular | Hsin-Yuan Huang, John Preskill |
| Fast and robust quantum state tomography from few basis measurements | TQC 2021 | regular | Daniel Stilck França, Fernando Brandao |
| Quantum simulation with randomized product formulas: A concentration analysis | TQC 2021 | regular | Chi-Fang Chen, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Joel Tropp |
| Predicting Features of Quantum Systems using Classical Shadows | QIP 2020 | regular | Hsin-Yuan Huang |
| Models of quantum complexity growth | QIP 2020 | regular | Nicholas Hunter-Jones, Wissam Chemissany, Fernando Brandao, John Preskill |
| Models of quantum complexity growth | TQC 2020 | regular | Nicholas Hunter-Jones, Wissam Chemissany, Fernando Brandao, John Preskill |
| Faster quantum and classical SDP approximations for quadratic binary optimization | TQC 2020 | regular | Daniel Stilck França, Fernando Brandao |
| Recovering quantum gates from few average gate fidelities | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Ingo Roth, Shelby Kimmel, Yi-Kai Liu, David Gross, Jens Eisert, Martin Kliesch |
| Guaranteed recovery of quantum processes from few measurements | TQC 2017 | regular | Martin Kliesch, Jens Eisert, David Gross |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Classical Design Techniques for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits | QIP 2025 | Tom Peham, Ludwig Schmid, Nina Brandl, Lucas Berent, Lukas Burgholzer, Markus Müller, Robert Wille |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2025 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2025 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2022 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Hsin-Yuan Huang | 5 |
| John Preskill | 5 |
| Fernando Brandao | 4 |
| Daniel Stilck França | 2 |
| David Gross | 2 |
| Jens Eisert | 2 |
| Martin Kliesch | 2 |
| Nicholas Hunter-Jones | 2 |
| Wissam Chemissany | 2 |
| Chi-Fang Chen | 1 |
| Giacomo Torlai | 1 |
| Hartmut Neven | 1 |
| Ingo Roth | 1 |
| Jan Nöller | 1 |
| Jarrod McClean | 1 |
| Joel Tropp | 1 |
| Lucas Berent | 1 |
| Ludwig Schmid | 1 |
| Lukas Burgholzer | 1 |
| Mariami Gachechildaze | 1 |