1
program role
40
collaborators
2021–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
3 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness of recognizing phases of matter | QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Thomas Schuster, Dominik Kufel, Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang |
We prove that recognizing the phase of matter of an unknown quantum state is quantum computationally hard. More specifically, we show that the worst-case runtime of any phase recognition algorithm must grow exponentially in the correlation length $\xi$ of the state. This exponential growth renders the problem practically infeasible even for moderate constant values of the correlation length $\xi$, and leads to super-polynomial quantum computational time in the system size $n$ whenever $\xi = \omega(\log n)$. Our results apply to a substantial portion of all known phases of matter, including symmetry-breaking phases and symmetry-protected topological phases for any discrete on-site symmetry group in any spatial dimension. To establish this hardness, we extend the study of pseudorandom unitaries to quantum systems with symmetries. We prove that symmetric pseudorandom unitaries exist under standard cryptographic conjectures, and can be constructed in extremely low circuit depths for any discrete on-site group. We also provide extensions of our results to systems with translation invariance and purely classical phases of matter. A key technical limitation is that the locality of the parent Hamiltonian of the states we consider is linear in $\xi$; removing this constraint remains an important open question. |
|||
| Entangling logical qubits without physical operations | TQC 2026 | regular | ▸Shayan Majidy, Jin Ming Koh, Anqi Gong, Andrei C. Diaconu, Daniel Bochen Tan, Alexandra A. Geim, Michael Gullans, Mikhail Lukin |
Fault-tolerant logical entangling gates are essential for scalable quantum computing, but are limited by the error rates and overheads of physical two-qubit gates and measurements. To address this limitation we introduce phantom codes---quantum error-correcting codes that realize entangling gates between all logical qubits in a codeblock purely through relabelling of physical qubits during compilation, yielding perfect fidelity with no spatial or temporal overhead. We present a systematic study of such codes. First, we identify phantom codes using complementary numerical and analytical approaches. We exhaustively enumerate all 2.71 x 10^{10} inequivalent CSS codes up to n=14 and identify additional instances up to n=21 via SAT-based methods. We then construct higher-distance phantom-code families using quantum Reed--Muller codes and the binarization of qudit codes. Across all identified codes, we characterize other supported fault-tolerant logical Clifford and non-Clifford operations. Second, through end-to-end noisy simulations with state preparation, full QEC cycles, and realistic physical error rates, we demonstrate scalable advantages of phantom codes over the surface code across multiple tasks. We observe one–to–two–order-of-magnitude reduction in logical infidelity at comparable qubit overhead for GHZ-state preparation and Trotterized many-body simulation tasks, given a modest preselection acceptance rate. Our work establishes phantom codes as a viable architectural route to fault-tolerant quantum computation with scalable benefits for workloads with dense local entangling structure, and introduces general tools for systematically exploring the broader landscape of quantum error-correcting codes. |
|||
| A polynomial-time classical algorithm for noisy quantum circuits | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Thomas Schuster, Chao Yin, Xun Gao |
9 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Cored product codes for quantum self-correction in three dimensions | QIP 2026 | Brenden Roberts, ▸Jin Ming Koh, Yi Tan |
| Factoring in near-linear depth using 2n + o(n) qubits | QIP 2025 | Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, Craig Gidney, Isaac Chuang |
| Quasicrystalline codes | QIP 2025 | Brenden Roberts, Yi Tan, Philip Crowley |
| An efficient classical algorithm for expectation values in any noisy quantum circuit | QIP 2024 | Thomas Schuster |
| Fracton physics in product codes | QIP 2024 | Yi Tan, Brenden Roberts |
| Quantum algorithms for many-body spectroscopy using dynamics and classical shadows | TQC 2024 | Nishad Maskara, Stefan Ostermann, James Shee, Marcin Kalinowski, Abigail McClain Gomez, Rodrigo Araiza Bravo, Varun Menon, Christian Kokail, Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Derek Wang, Anna Krylov, Martin Head-Gordon, Mikhail Lukin, Susanne Yelin |
| A quasi-polynomial time classical algorithm for almost any noisy quantum circuit | TQC 2024 | Thomas Schuster |
| An efficiently-verifiable test of quantum advantage | QIP 2021 | Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, Soonwon Choi, Umesh Vazirani |
| Many-body quantum teleportation via operator spreading in the traversable wormhole protocol | QIP 2021 | Thomas Schuster, Bryce Kobrin, Ping Gao, Iris Cong, Emil T. Khabiboulline, Norbert Linke, Mikhail Lukin, Christopher Monroe, Beni Yoshida |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Thomas Schuster | 5 |
| Brenden Roberts | 3 |
| Mikhail Lukin | 3 |
| Yi Tan | 3 |
| Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer | 2 |
| Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang | 2 |
| Jin Ming Koh | 2 |
| Abigail McClain Gomez | 1 |
| Alexandra A. Geim | 1 |
| Andrei C. Diaconu | 1 |
| Anna Krylov | 1 |
| Anqi Gong | 1 |
| Beni Yoshida | 1 |
| Bryce Kobrin | 1 |
| Chao Yin | 1 |
| Christian Kokail | 1 |
| Christopher Monroe | 1 |
| Craig Gidney | 1 |
| Daniel Bochen Tan | 1 |
| Derek Wang | 1 |