37
collaborators
2012–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
2 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pseudorandom unitaries are neither real nor sparse nor noise-robust ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Tobias Haug, Kishor Bharti |
Pseudorandom quantum states (PRSs) and pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) possess the dual nature of being efficiently constructible while appearing completely random to any efficient quantum algorithm. In this study, we establish fundamental bounds on pseudorandomness. We show that PRSs and PRUs exist only when the probability that an error occurs is negligible, ruling out their generation on noisy intermediate-scale and early fault-tolerant quantum computers. Further, we show that PRUs need imaginarity while PRS do not have this restriction. This implies that quantum randomness requires in general a complex-valued formalism of quantum mechanics, while for random quantum states real numbers suffice. Additionally, we derive lower bounds on the coherence of PRSs and PRUs, ruling out the existence of sparse PRUs and PRSs. We also show that the notions of PRS, PRUs and pseudorandom scramblers (PRSSs) are distinct in terms of resource requirements. We introduce the concept of pseudoresources, where states which contain a low amount of a given resource masquerade as high-resource states. We define pseudocoherence, pseudopurity and pseudoimaginarity, and identify three distinct types of pseudoresources in terms of their masquerading capabilities. Our work also establishes rigorous bounds on the efficiency of property testing, demonstrating the exponential complexity in distinguishing real quantum states from imaginary ones, in contrast to the efficient measurability of unitary imaginarity. Lastly, we show that the transformation from a complex to a real model of quantum computation is inefficient, in contrast to the reverse process, which is efficient. Our results establish fundamental limits on property testing and provide valuable insights into quantum pseudorandomness. |
|||
| The effects of free will on randomness expansion | TQC 2012 | regular | Michael Hall, Setiawan, James Pope, Artur Ekert, Alastair Kay, Valerio Scarani |
16 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum Error Correction in adversarial regimes | QIP 2026 | ▸Rahul Arvind, Nikhil Bansal, Tobias Haug, Kishor Bharti |
| Quantum Error Correction in Adversarial Regimes | TQC 2026 | Rahul Arvind, Nikhil Bansal, Tobias Haug, Kishor Bharti |
In adversarial settings, where attackers can deliberately and strategically corrupt quantum data, standard quantum error correction reaches its limits. It can only correct up to half the code distance and must output a unique answer. Quantum list decoding offers a promising alternative. By allowing the decoder to output a short list of possible errors, it becomes possible to tolerate far more errors, even under worst-case noise. But two fundamental questions remain: which quantum codes support list decoding, and can we design decoding schemes that are secure against efficient, computationally bounded adversaries? In this work, we answer both. To identify which codes are list-decodable, we provide a generalized version of the Knill-Laflamme conditions. Then, using tools from quantum cryptography, we build an unambiguous list decoding protocol based on pseudorandom unitaries. Our scheme is secure against any quantum polynomial-time adversary, even across multiple decoding attempts, in contrast to previous schemes. Our approach connects coding theory with complexity-based quantum cryptography, paving the way for secure quantum information processing in adversarial settings. |
||
| Readout Error Mitigation for Mid-Circuit Measurements and Feedforward | QIP 2025 | Jin Ming Koh, Jayne Thompson |
| Analytical Expressions for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm | QIP 2025 | Truman Yu Ng, Jin Ming Koh |
| Fundamental Limitations on Communication over a Quantum Network | QIP 2024 | Junjing Xing, Tianfeng Feng, Fan Zhaobing, Haitao Ma, Kishor Bharti, Yunlong Xiao |
| Error-mitigated fermionic classical shadows on noisy quantum devices | TQC 2024 | Bujiao Wu |
| Fundamental Limitations on Communication over a Quantum Network | TQC 2024 | Junjing Xing, Tianfeng Feng, Zhaobing Fan, Haitao Ma, Kishor Bharti, Yunlong Xiao |
| Efficient classical simulation of Clifford circuits with nonstabilizer input states | QIP 2020 | Kaifeng Bu |
| Classical simulation of quantum circuits by half Gauss sums | QIP 2020 | Kaifeng Bu |
| How many qubits are needed for quantum computational supremacy? | QIP 2019 | Alexander M. Dalzell, Aram Harrow, Rolando La Placa |
| Quantum simulation from the bottom up: the case of rebits | QIP 2018 | Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Theodore Yoder |
| Quantum Advantage from Conjugated Clifford Circuits | QIP 2018 | Adam Bouland, Joseph F. Fitzsimons |
| Computing quopit Clifford circuit amplitudes via sum-over-paths | QIP 2017 | Mark Penney, Robert Spekkens |
| Further extensions of Clifford circuits and their classical simulation complexities | QIP 2017 | — |
| Doubly infinite separation of quantum information and communication | QIP 2016 | Zi-Wen Liu, Christopher Perry, Yechao Zhu, Scott Aaronson |
| The effects of reduced "free will" on Bell-based randomness expansion | QCRYPT 2012 | Le Phuc Thinh, Michael J.W. Hall, Setiawan, James Pope, Chiara Marletto, Alastair Kay, Valerio Scarani, Artur Ekert |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Kishor Bharti | 5 |
| Tobias Haug | 3 |
| Alastair Kay | 2 |
| Artur Ekert | 2 |
| Haitao Ma | 2 |
| James Pope | 2 |
| Jin Ming Koh | 2 |
| Junjing Xing | 2 |
| Kaifeng Bu | 2 |
| Nikhil Bansal | 2 |
| Rahul Arvind | 2 |
| Setiawan | 2 |
| Tianfeng Feng | 2 |
| Valerio Scarani | 2 |
| Yunlong Xiao | 2 |
| Adam Bouland | 1 |
| Alexander M. Dalzell | 1 |
| Aram Harrow | 1 |
| Bujiao Wu | 1 |
| Chiara Marletto | 1 |