30
collaborators
2019–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
3 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness | QIP 2025 | regular | Atul Singh Arora, Alexandru Cojocaru, Andrea Coladangelo |
| Strategic Codes: The Universal Spatio-Temporal Framework for Quantum Error-Correction | TQC 2025 | regular | Andrew Tanggara, Mile Gu |
|
Pseudorandom unitaries are neither real nor sparse nor noise-robust ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Tobias Haug, Dax Enshan Koh |
Pseudorandom quantum states (PRSs) and pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) possess the dual nature of being efficiently constructible while appearing completely random to any efficient quantum algorithm. In this study, we establish fundamental bounds on pseudorandomness. We show that PRSs and PRUs exist only when the probability that an error occurs is negligible, ruling out their generation on noisy intermediate-scale and early fault-tolerant quantum computers. Further, we show that PRUs need imaginarity while PRS do not have this restriction. This implies that quantum randomness requires in general a complex-valued formalism of quantum mechanics, while for random quantum states real numbers suffice. Additionally, we derive lower bounds on the coherence of PRSs and PRUs, ruling out the existence of sparse PRUs and PRSs. We also show that the notions of PRS, PRUs and pseudorandom scramblers (PRSSs) are distinct in terms of resource requirements. We introduce the concept of pseudoresources, where states which contain a low amount of a given resource masquerade as high-resource states. We define pseudocoherence, pseudopurity and pseudoimaginarity, and identify three distinct types of pseudoresources in terms of their masquerading capabilities. Our work also establishes rigorous bounds on the efficiency of property testing, demonstrating the exponential complexity in distinguishing real quantum states from imaginary ones, in contrast to the efficient measurability of unitary imaginarity. Lastly, we show that the transformation from a complex to a real model of quantum computation is inefficient, in contrast to the reverse process, which is efficient. Our results establish fundamental limits on property testing and provide valuable insights into quantum pseudorandomness. |
|||
12 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum Error Correction in adversarial regimes | QIP 2026 | ▸Rahul Arvind, Nikhil Bansal, Dax Enshan Koh, Tobias Haug |
| Contextuality of Quantum Error-Correcting Codes | QIP 2026 | ▸Derek Khu, Andrew Tanggara, Chao Jin |
| Qudit low-density parity-check codes | QIP 2026 | ▸Daniel J. Spencer, Andrew Tanggara, Tobias Haug, Derek Khu |
| Fault-tolerant hyperbolic Floquet quantum error correcting codes | QIP 2024 | Ali Fahimniya, Hossein Dehghani, Sheryl Mathew, Alicia Kollár, Alexey Gorshkov, Michael Gullans |
| Fundamental Limitations on Communication over a Quantum Network | QIP 2024 | Junjing Xing, Tianfeng Feng, Fan Zhaobing, Haitao Ma, Dax Enshan Koh, Yunlong Xiao |
| On the power of geometrically-local classical and quantum circuits | QIP 2024 | Rahul Jain |
| On the power of geometrically-local classical and quantum circuits | TQC 2024 | Rahul Jain |
| Fundamental Limitations on Communication over a Quantum Network | TQC 2024 | Junjing Xing, Tianfeng Feng, Zhaobing Fan, Haitao Ma, Dax Enshan Koh, Yunlong Xiao |
| Certifying Temporal Correlations | QIP 2023 | Harshank Shrotriya, Leong Chuan Kwek |
| Robust Self Testing of All Pure Bipartite Maximally Entangled States via Quantum Steering | QCRYPT 2021 | Harshank Shrotriya, Leong-Chuan Kwek |
The idea of self-testing is to render guarantees concerning the inner workings of a device based on the measurement statistics. It is one of the most formidable quantum certification and benchmarking schemes. Here, we have shown that any bipartite pure entangled state can be self-tested through Quantum Steering. Analogous to the tilted CHSH inequality, we use a steering inequality called Tilted Steering Inequality for self-testing any pure two-qubit entangled state. We have further used this inequality to self-test any bipartite pure entangled state by certifying two-dimensional sub-spaces of the qudit state by observing the structure of the set of assemblages obtained on the trusted side after measurements are made on the un-trusted side. Finally, as a novel feature of self testing via steering, we use the notion of Assemblage based Robust Self Testing to provide robustness bounds for the self testing result in the case of pure maximally entangled states of any local dimension. |
||
| Self Testing of All Pure Bipartite Entangled States via Quantum Steering | QIP 2021 | Harshank Shrotriya, Leong-Chuan Kwek |
| Robust self-testing via noncontextuality inequalities Varvitsiotis | QIP 2019 | Leong-Chuan Kwek, Maharshi Ray, Antonios |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Dax Enshan Koh | 4 |
| Andrew Tanggara | 3 |
| Harshank Shrotriya | 3 |
| Leong-Chuan Kwek | 3 |
| Tobias Haug | 3 |
| Derek Khu | 2 |
| Haitao Ma | 2 |
| Junjing Xing | 2 |
| Rahul Jain | 2 |
| Tianfeng Feng | 2 |
| Yunlong Xiao | 2 |
| Alexandru Cojocaru | 1 |
| Alexey Gorshkov | 1 |
| Ali Fahimniya | 1 |
| Alicia Kollár | 1 |
| Andrea Coladangelo | 1 |
| Antonios | 1 |
| Atul Singh Arora | 1 |
| Chao Jin | 1 |
| Daniel J. Spencer | 1 |