30
collaborators
2021–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
1 Talk
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pseudorandom unitaries are neither real nor sparse nor noise-robust ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Kishor Bharti, Dax Enshan Koh |
Pseudorandom quantum states (PRSs) and pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) possess the dual nature of being efficiently constructible while appearing completely random to any efficient quantum algorithm. In this study, we establish fundamental bounds on pseudorandomness. We show that PRSs and PRUs exist only when the probability that an error occurs is negligible, ruling out their generation on noisy intermediate-scale and early fault-tolerant quantum computers. Further, we show that PRUs need imaginarity while PRS do not have this restriction. This implies that quantum randomness requires in general a complex-valued formalism of quantum mechanics, while for random quantum states real numbers suffice. Additionally, we derive lower bounds on the coherence of PRSs and PRUs, ruling out the existence of sparse PRUs and PRSs. We also show that the notions of PRS, PRUs and pseudorandom scramblers (PRSSs) are distinct in terms of resource requirements. We introduce the concept of pseudoresources, where states which contain a low amount of a given resource masquerade as high-resource states. We define pseudocoherence, pseudopurity and pseudoimaginarity, and identify three distinct types of pseudoresources in terms of their masquerading capabilities. Our work also establishes rigorous bounds on the efficiency of property testing, demonstrating the exponential complexity in distinguishing real quantum states from imaginary ones, in contrast to the efficient measurability of unitary imaginarity. Lastly, we show that the transformation from a complex to a real model of quantum computation is inefficient, in contrast to the reverse process, which is efficient. Our results establish fundamental limits on property testing and provide valuable insights into quantum pseudorandomness. |
|||
12 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum Error Correction in adversarial regimes | QIP 2026 | ▸Rahul Arvind, Nikhil Bansal, Dax Enshan Koh, Kishor Bharti |
| Qudit low-density parity-check codes | QIP 2026 | ▸Daniel J. Spencer, Andrew Tanggara, Derek Khu, Kishor Bharti |
| Efficient witnessing and testing of magic in mixed quantum states | QIP 2026 | Poetri Sonya Tarabunga |
| Exponential Speed-ups for Structured Goemans-Williamson relaxations via Quantum Gibbs States and Pauli Sparsity | QIP 2026 | ▸Daniel Stilck França, Haomu Yuan, Egor Tiunov, Ilia Luchnikov, Leandro Aolita |
| Hierarchical quantum decoders | TQC 2026 | Nirupam Basak, Ankith Mohan, Andrew Tanggara, Goutam Paul, Kishor Bharti |
Decoders are a critical component of fault-tolerant quantum computing. They must identify errors based on syndrome measurements to correct quantum states. While finding the optimal correction is NP-hard and thus extremely difficult, approximate decoders with faster runtime often rely on uncontrolled heuristics. In this work, we propose a family of hierarchical quantum decoders with a tunable trade-off between speed and accuracy while retaining guarantees of optimality. We use the Lasserre Sum-of-Squares (SOS) hierarchy from optimization theory to relax the decoding problem. This approach creates a sequence of Semidefinite Programs (SDPs). Lower levels of the hierarchy are faster but approximate, while higher levels are slower but more accurate. We demonstrate that even low levels of this hierarchy significantly outperform standard Linear Programming relaxations. Our results on rotated surface codes and honeycomb color codes show that the SOS decoder approaches the performance of exact decoding. We find that Levels 2 and 3 of our hierarchy perform nearly as well as the exact solver. We analyze the convergence using rank-loop criteria and compare the method against other relaxation schemes. This work bridges the gap between fast heuristics and rigorous optimal decoding. |
||
| Exponential Speed-ups for Structured Goemans-Williamson relaxations via Quantum Gibbs States and Pauli Sparsity | TQC 2026 | Daniel Stilck França, Haomu Yuan, Egor Tiunov, Ilia Luchnikov, Leandro Aolita |
Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems are prevalent in various applications and are known to be NP-hard. The seminal work of Goemans and Williamson introduced a semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation for such problems, solvable in polynomial time that upper bounds the optimal value. Their approach also enables randomized rounding techniques to obtain feasible solutions with provable performance guarantees. In this work, we identify instances of QUBO problems where matrix multiplicative weight methods lead to quantum and quantum-inspired algorithms that approximate the Goemans-Williamson SDP exponentially faster than existing methods, achieving polylogarithmic time complexity relative to the problem dimension. This speedup is attainable under the assumption that the QUBO cost matrix is sparse when expressed as a linear combination of Pauli strings satisfying certain algebraic constraints, and leverages efficient quantum and classical simulation results for quantum Gibbs states. We demonstrate how to verify these conditions efficiently given the decomposition. Additionally, we explore heuristic methods for randomized rounding procedures and extract the energy of a feasible point of the QUBO in polylogarithmic time. While the practical relevance of instances where our methods excel remains to be fully established, we propose heuristic algorithms with broader applicability and identify Kronecker graphs as a promising class for applying our techniques. We conduct numerical experiments to benchmark our methods. Notably, by utilizing tensor network methods, we solve an SDP with $D = 2^{50}$ variables and extract a feasible point which is certifiably within $0.15\%$ of the optimum of the QUBO through our approach on a desktop, reaching dimensions millions of times larger than those handled by existing SDP or QUBO solvers, whether heuristic or rigorous. |
||
| Quantum Error Correction in Adversarial Regimes | TQC 2026 | Rahul Arvind, Nikhil Bansal, Dax Enshan Koh, Kishor Bharti |
In adversarial settings, where attackers can deliberately and strategically corrupt quantum data, standard quantum error correction reaches its limits. It can only correct up to half the code distance and must output a unique answer. Quantum list decoding offers a promising alternative. By allowing the decoder to output a short list of possible errors, it becomes possible to tolerate far more errors, even under worst-case noise. But two fundamental questions remain: which quantum codes support list decoding, and can we design decoding schemes that are secure against efficient, computationally bounded adversaries? In this work, we answer both. To identify which codes are list-decodable, we provide a generalized version of the Knill-Laflamme conditions. Then, using tools from quantum cryptography, we build an unambiguous list decoding protocol based on pseudorandom unitaries. Our scheme is secure against any quantum polynomial-time adversary, even across multiple decoding attempts, in contrast to previous schemes. Our approach connects coding theory with complexity-based quantum cryptography, paving the way for secure quantum information processing in adversarial settings. |
||
| A magic criterion (almost) as nice as PPT, with applications in distillation and detection | TQC 2026 | Zhenhuan Liu, Qi Ye, Zi-Wen Liu, Ingo Roth |
We introduce a mixed-state magic criterion, the Triangle Criterion, which plays a role for magic analogous to the Positive Partial Transposition (PPT) criterion for entanglement: it combines strong detection capability, a clear geometric interpretation, and an operational link to magic distillation. Using this criterion, we uncover several new features of multi-qubit magic distillation and detection. We prove that genuinely multi-qubit magic distillation protocols are strictly more powerful than all single-qubit schemes by showing that the Triangle Criterion is not stable under tensor products, in sharp contrast to the PPT criterion. Moreover, we show that, with overwhelming probability, multi-qubit magic states with relatively low rank cannot be distilled by any single-qubit distillation protocol. We derive an upper bound on the minimal purity of magic states, which is conjectured to be tight with both numerical and constructive evidences. Using this minimal-purity result, we predict the existence of unfaithful magic states, namely states that cannot be detected by any fidelity-based magic witness, and reveal fundamental limitations of mixed-state magic detection in any single-copy scheme. |
||
| Efficient stabilizer entropies for quantum computers | TQC 2024 | Soovin Lee, Myungshik Kim |
| Understanding generalization with quantum geometry | TQC 2024 | Myungshik Kim |
| Efficient measures of magic for quantum computers and matrix product states | QIP 2023 | Myungshik Kim, Lorenzo Piroli |
| On-Chip Quantum Autoencoder for Teleportation of High-Dimensional Quantum States | QCRYPT 2021 | Hui Zhang, Lingxiao Wan, Wai-Keong Mok, Hong Cai, Muhammad Faeyz Karim, Kwek Leong Chuan, Ai Qun Liu |
Currently most quantum teleportation experiments are based on qubits. Here, we demonstrate a quantum autoencoder assisted teleportation for high-dimensional quantum states. Our method of training the autoencoder allows us to take a finite sample of those states, learn how to compress them to qubits with nearly unit fidelity. After training, we can teleport any further states from the sender and reconstruct them with high fidelity on the receiver part. We verify the proposed scheme by teleporting a qutrit via a silicon-photonic chip. High fidelity is achieved between the input qutrit and the qutrit recovered from the teleported qubit. |
||
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Kishor Bharti | 5 |
| Dax Enshan Koh | 3 |
| Myungshik Kim | 3 |
| Andrew Tanggara | 2 |
| Daniel Stilck França | 2 |
| Egor Tiunov | 2 |
| Haomu Yuan | 2 |
| Ilia Luchnikov | 2 |
| Leandro Aolita | 2 |
| Nikhil Bansal | 2 |
| Rahul Arvind | 2 |
| Ai Qun Liu | 1 |
| Ankith Mohan | 1 |
| Daniel J. Spencer | 1 |
| Derek Khu | 1 |
| Goutam Paul | 1 |
| Hong Cai | 1 |
| Hui Zhang | 1 |
| Ingo Roth | 1 |
| Kwek Leong Chuan | 1 |