8
talks
2
posters
2
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2014–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Oracle separation of QMA and QCMA with bounded adaptivity ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Shalev Ben-David |
We give an oracle separation between QMA and QCMA for quantum algorithms that have bounded adaptivity in their oracle queries; that is, the number of rounds of oracle calls is small, though each round may involve polynomially many queries in parallel. Our oracle construction is a simplified version of the construction used recently by Li, Liu, Pelecanos, and Yamakawa (2023), who showed an oracle separation between QMA and QCMA when the quantum algorithms are only allowed to access the oracle classically. To prove our results, we introduce a property of relations called slipperiness, which may be useful for getting a fully general classical oracle separation between QMA and QCMA. |
|||
|
On the Power of Quantum Distributed Proofs ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Atsuya Hasegawa, Harumichi Nishimura |
Quantum nondeterministic distributed computing was recently introduced as dQMA (distributed quantum Merlin-Arthur) protocols by Fraigniaud, Le Gall, Nishimura and Paz (ITCS 2021). In dQMA protocols, with the help of quantum proofs and local communication, nodes on a network verify a global property of the network. Fraigniaud et al. showed that, when the network size is small, there exists an exponential separation in proof size between distributed classical and quantum verification protocols, for the equality problem, where the verifiers check if all the data owned by a subset of them are identical. In this paper, we further investigate and characterize the power of the dQMA protocols for various decision problems. First, we give a more efficient dQMA protocol for the equality problem with a simpler analysis. This is done by adding a symmetrization step on each node and exploiting properties of the permutation test, which is a generalization of the SWAP test. We also show a quantum advantage for the equality problem on path networks still persists even when the network size is large, by considering ``relay points'' between extreme nodes. Second, we show that even in a general network, there exist efficient dQMA protocols for the ranking verification problem, the Hamming distance problem, and more problems that derive from efficient quantum one-way communication protocols. Third, in a line network, we construct an efficient dQMA protocol for a problem that has an efficient two-party QMA communication protocol. Finally, we obtain the first lower bounds on the proof and communication cost of dQMA protocols. To prove a lower bound on the equality problem, we show any dQMA protocol with an entangled proof between nodes can be simulated with a dQMA protocol with a separable proof between nodes by using a QMA communication-complete problem introduced by Raz and Shpilka (CCC 2004). |
|||
| A direct product theorem for quantum communication complexity with applications to device-independent QKD | QIP 2022 | plenary_short | ▸Rahul Jain |
| Composably secure device-independent encryption with certified deletion | QIP 2021 | regular | Ernest Y.-Z. Tan |
Abstract We study the task of encryption with certified deletion (ECD) introduced by Broadbent and Islam (2019), but in a device-independent setting: we show that it is possible to achieve this task even when the honest parties do not trust their quantum devices. Moreover, we define security for the ECD task in a composable manner and show that our ECD protocol achieves composable security. Our protocol is based on device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD), and in particular the parallel DIQKD protocol based on the magic square non-local game, given by Jain, Miller and Shi (2017). To achieve certified deletion, we use a property of the magic square game observed by Fu and Miller (2017), namely that a two-round variant of the game can be used to certify deletion of a single random bit. In order to achieve certified deletion security for arbitrarily long messages from this property, we prove a parallel repetition theorem for two-round non-local games, which may be of independent interest. |
|||
| On Query-to-Communication Lifting of Quantum Adversaries | QIP 2021 | regular | Anurag Anshu, Shalev Ben-David |
Abstract We investigate query-to-communication lifting theorems for models related to the quantum adversary bounds. Our results are as follows: 1. We show that the classical adversary bound lifts to a lower bound on randomized communication complexity with a constant-sized gadget. We also show that the classical adversary bound is a strictly stronger lower bound technique than the previously-lifted measure known as critical block sensitivity, making our lifting theorem one of the strongest lifting theorems for randomized communication complexity using a constant-sized gadget. 2. Turning to quantum models, we show a connection between lifting theorems for quantum adversary bounds and secure 2-party quantum computation in a certain "honest-but-curious" model. Under the assumption that such secure 2-party computation is impossible, we show that a simplified version of the positive-weight adversary bound lifts to a quantum communication lower bound using a constant-sized gadget. We also give an unconditional lifting theorem which lower bounds bounded-round quantum communication protocols. 3. Finally, we give some new results in query complexity. We show that the classical adversary and the positive-weight quantum adversary are quadratically related. We also show that the positive-weight quantum adversary is never larger than the square of the approximate degree. Both relations hold even for partial functions. |
|||
| A Direct Product Theorem for One-Way Quantum Communication | TQC 2021 | regular | Rahul Jain |
| A device-independent protocol for XOR oblivious transfer | TQC 2020 | regular | Jamie Sikora, Ernest Y.-Z. Tan |
| Optimal Bounds for Parity-Oblivious Random Access Codes with Applications | TQC 2014 | regular | Andre Chailloux, Iordanis Kerenidis, Jamie Sikora |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Are uncloneable proof and advice states strictly necessary? | QIP 2025 | Rohit Chatterjee, Supartha Podder |
| Device-independent uncloneable encryption | QCRYPT 2023 | Ernest Y.-Z. Tan |
Uncloneable encryption, first introduced by Broadbent and Lord (TQC 2020) is a quantum encryption scheme in which a quantum ciphertext cannot be distributed between two non-communicating parties such that, given access to the decryption key, both parties cannot learn the underlying plaintext. In this work, we introduce a variant of uncloneable encryption in which several possible decryption keys can decrypt a particular encryption, and the security requirement is that two parties who receive independently generated decryption keys cannot both learn the underlying ciphertext. We show that this variant of uncloneable encryption can be achieved device-independently, i.e., without trusting the quantum states and measurements used in the scheme. Moreover, we show our variant of uncloneable encryption works just as well as the original definition in constructing quantum money, and can be used to get uncloneable bits without using the quantum random oracle model. Finally, we show that a simple modification of our scheme yields a single-decryptor encryption scheme, which was a related notion introduced by Georgiou and Zhandry. In particular, the resulting single-decryptor encryption scheme achieves device-independent security with respect to a standard definition of security against random plaintexts. |
||
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2025 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Ernest Y.-Z. Tan | 3 |
| Jamie Sikora | 2 |
| Rahul Jain | 2 |
| Shalev Ben-David | 2 |
| Andre Chailloux | 1 |
| Anurag Anshu | 1 |
| Atsuya Hasegawa | 1 |
| Harumichi Nishimura | 1 |
| Iordanis Kerenidis | 1 |
| Rohit Chatterjee | 1 |
| Supartha Podder | 1 |