4
talks
5
posters
2
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2015–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental realisation of quantum oblivious transfer | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Ryan Amiri, Robert Stárek, Michal Mičuda, Ladislav Mišta, Miloslav Dušek, Petros Wallden |
| Reconfigurable network for quantum digital signatures mediated by measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2017 | regular | George Roberts, Marco Lucamarini, Zhiliang Yuan, James Dynes, Lucian Comandar, Andrew Sharpe, Andrew Shields, Marcos Curty, Ittoop V. Puthoor |
| Unconditionally secure quantum signatures | QCRYPT 2015 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Advances in Experimental Quantum Digital Signatures | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Ross Donaldson, Robert Collins, Klaudia Kleczkowska, Ryan Amiri, Petros Wallden, Vedran Dunjko, John Jeffers, Gerald Buller |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Towards better Rabin oblivious transfer protocols | QCRYPT 2025 | Akshay Bansal, James T. Peat, Jamie Sikora, Jiawei Wu |
Rabin oblivious transfer is the cryptographic task where Alice wishes to receive a bit from Bob but it may get lost with probability 1/2. In this work, we provide protocol designs which yield quantum protocols with improved security. Moreover, we provide a constant lower bound on any Rabin oblivious transfer protocol. To quantify the security of this task with asymmetric cheating notions, we introduce the notion of cheating advantage which may be of independent interest in the study of other asymmetric cryptographic primitives as well. |
||
| Towards better Rabin oblivious transfer protocols | QIP 2025 | Akshay Bansal, Jiawei Wu, Jamie Sikora, James T. Peat |
| Mixing Classical and Quantum Oblivious Transfer Protocols | QCRYPT 2024 | James T. Peat, Lara Stroh |
Oblivious transfer is a two-party cryptographic primitive which has been the interest of study as it can be used as a building block for multiparty computation, such as building a voting system between distrusting parties. It has been shown, however, that perfectly secure oblivious transfer is impossible in both the classical and quantum setting. This has pushed the study of oblivious transfer in two directions. The first is applying assumptions about the abilities of a cheating party such as in the bounded storage model. The second is looking for the absolute bounds on a cheating party with no restrictions. We study the latter area, using one version of oblivious transfer known as Rabin oblivious transfer. This is a two-party protocol where the sender holds one bit, and the receiver obtains this bit with a set probability. |
||
| Quantum Digital Signatures Transmitted Over a Channel Loss Equivalent to 134 km | QCRYPT 2017 | Robert Collins, Ryan Amiri, Mikio Fujiwara, Toshimori Honjo, Kaoru Shimizu, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Masahiro Takeoka, Ross Donaldson, Masahide Sasaki, Gerald Buller |
| Almost tight lower bounds for 1-out-of-2 quantum oblivious transfer | QCRYPT 2017 | Ryan Amiri, Petros Wallden |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2021 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2017 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Ryan Amiri | 4 |
| James T. Peat | 3 |
| Petros Wallden | 3 |
| Akshay Bansal | 2 |
| Gerald Buller | 2 |
| Jamie Sikora | 2 |
| Jiawei Wu | 2 |
| Robert Collins | 2 |
| Ross Donaldson | 2 |
| Andrew Sharpe | 1 |
| Andrew Shields | 1 |
| George Roberts | 1 |
| Ittoop V. Puthoor | 1 |
| James Dynes | 1 |
| John Jeffers | 1 |
| Kaoru Shimizu | 1 |
| Kiyoshi Tamaki | 1 |
| Klaudia Kleczkowska | 1 |
| Ladislav Mišta | 1 |
| Lara Stroh | 1 |