3
program roles
2
organizing roles
1
leadership role
27
collaborators
2006–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
15 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenpath Traversal by Poisson-Distributed Phase Randomisation | TQC 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Joseph Cunningham |
| Quadratic speedup for spatial search by continuous-time quantum walk | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸Simon Apers, Shantanav Chakraborty, Leonardo Novo |
| Analytic quantum weak coin flipping protocols with arbitrarily small bias | QIP 2021 | regular | Atul Singh Arora, Chrysoula Vlachou |
Abstract Weak coin flipping (WCF) is a fundamental cryptographic primitive for two-party secure computation, where two distrustful parties need to remotely establish a shared random bit whilst having opposite preferred outcomes. It is the strongest known primitive with arbitrarily close to perfect security quantumly while classically, its security is completely compromised (unless one makes further assumptions, such as computational hardness). A WCF protocol is said to have bias \epsilon if neither party can force their preferred outcome with probability greater than 1/2 + \epsilon. Classical WCF protocols are shown to have bias 1/2, i.e., a cheating party can always force their preferred outcome. On the other hand, there exist quantum WCF protocols with arbitrarily small bias, as Mochon showed in his seminal work in 2007 [arXiv:0711.4114]. In particular, he proved the existence of a family of WCF protocols approaching bias \epsilon(k)=1/(4k + 2) for arbitrarily large k and proposed a protocol with bias 1/6. Last year, Arora, Roland and Weis presented a protocol with bias 1/10 and to go below this bias, they designed an algorithm that numerically constructs unitary matrices corresponding to WCF protocols with arbitrarily small bias [STOC'19, p.205-216]. In this work, we present new techniques which yield a fully analytical construction of WCF protocols with bias arbitrarily close to zero, thus achieving a solution that has been missing for more than a decade. Furthermore, our new techniques lead to a simplified proof of existence of WCF protocols by circumventing the non-constructive part of Mochon's proof. As an example, we illustrate the construction of a WCF protocol with bias 1/14. |
|||
| Analytic quantum weak coin flipping protocols with arbitrarily small bias | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Atul Singh Arora, Chrysoula Vlachou |
Weak coin flipping (WCF) is a fundamental cryptographic primitive, where two distrustful parties need to remotely establish a shared random bit, whilst having opposite preferred outcomes. A WCF protocol is said to have bias ε if neither party can force their preferred outcome with probability greater than 1/2+ε. Classical WCF protocols are shown to have bias 1/2, i.e., a cheating party can always force their preferred outcome. A lower bias can only be achieved by employing extra assumptions, such as computational hardness. On the other hand, there exist quantum WCF protocols with arbitrarily small bias, as Mochon showed in his seminal work in 2007 [arXiv:0711.4114]. In particular, he proved the existence of a family of WCF protocols approaching bias ε(k) = 1/(4k + 2) for arbitrarily large k and proposed a protocol with bias 1/6. Last year, Arora, Roland and Weis presented a protocol with bias 1/10 and to go below this bias, they designed an algorithm that numerically constructs unitary matrices corresponding to WCF protocols with arbitrarily small bias [STOC’19, p.205-216]. In this work, we present new techniques which yield a fully analytical construction of WCF protocols with bias arbitrarily close to zero, thus achieving a solution that has been missing for more than a decade. Furthermore, our new techniques lead to a simplified proof of existence of WCF protocols by circumventing the non-constructive part of Mochon’s proof. The construction of an explicit WCF protocol approaching bias 1/14 is illustrated as an example. |
|||
| Weak Coin Flipping | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Atul Singh Arora, Stephan Weis |
| Robust Bell Inequalities from Communication Complexity | TQC 2016 | regular | Sophie Laplante, Mathieu Lauriere, Alexandre Nolin, Gabriel Ignacio Senno |
| A Universal Adiabatic Quantum Query Algorithm | TQC 2015 | regular | Mathieu Brandeho |
| “Bell tests and applications to communication and information complexity.” | QIP 2013 | regular | Iordanis Kerenidis, Sophie Laplante, Virginie Lerays, David Xiao |
|
A strong direct product theorem for quantum query complexity ↗
|
QIP 2012 | invited | Troy Lee |
|
Quantum rejection sampling ↗
|
QIP 2012 | regular | Martin Rötteler, Maris Ozols |
|
Finding is as easy as detecting for quantum walks ↗
|
QIP 2011 | invited | Hari Krovi, Frédéric Magniez, Maris Ozols |
|
On the additive and multiplicative adversary methods ↗
|
QIP 2011 | regular | Loïck Magnin, Martin Rötteler |
|
Adiabatic quantum optimization fails for random instances of NP-complete problems ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Boris Altshuler, Hari Krovi |
| The complexity of simulating non-signaling distributions | QIP 2008 | regular | ▸Julien Degorre, Marc Kaplan, Sophie Laplante |
| Simulating quantum correlations as a distributed sampling problem | QIP 2006 | regular | Julien Degorre, Sophie Laplante |
13 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Alternative adiabatic dynamics from Poissonisation | QIP 2026 | ▸Joseph Cunningham |
| Alternative adiabatic quantum dynamics with algorithmic applications | TQC 2026 | Joseph Cunningham |
We propose a general framework for analysing the performance of quantum algorithms that consist of performing discrete operations controlled by a Poisson process. This extends our previous work [1]. In particular, we are interested in emulating certain features of adiabatic quantum computation without having to simulate time-dependent Hamiltonian evolution, since this typically causes a significant discretisation cost. We can also Poissonise the discretisation processes themselves. In this way we are able to show that discretisation in the context of adiabatic quantum computing is less costly than the general bounds on the Trotterisation error would imply. In this way we are able to reproduce key results from [2]. The resulting error bounds share many key features with the error bounds in adiabatic quantum computation. And many results are directly applicable. As applications, we show how our framework yields six distinct approaches to both the Grover search problem and the quantum linear systems problem that almost all achieve optimal asymptotic complexity. |
||
| Random Compilers for Hamiltonian Simulation via Markov Chain | TQC 2024 | Benoît Dubus |
| Quantum Weak Coin Flipping with bias 1/(4k+2) | QIP 2020 | Atul Singh Arora, Chrysoula Vlachou |
| How fast do quantum walks mix? | QIP 2020 | Shantanav Chakraborty, Kyle Luh |
| Finding a marked node on any graph by continuous time quantum walk | QIP 2019 | Shantanav Chakraborty, Leonardo Novo |
| Weak Coin Flipping beyond bias 1/6 | QIP 2018 | Atul Arora, Stephan Weis |
| Robust Bell inequalities from communication complexity | QIP 2017 | Sophie Laplante, Mathieu Lauriere, Alexandre Nolin, Gabriel Ignacio Senno |
| An optimal adiabatic quantum query algorithm | QIP 2015 | Mathieu Brandeho |
| Explicit relation between all lower bound techniques for quantum query complexity | QIP 2013 | Loïck Magnin |
| Quantum adversary lower bounds by polynomials | QIP 2012 | Loïck Magnin |
| Quantum algorithms for the hidden shift problem of Boolean functions | QIP 2011 | Maris Ozols, Martin Rötteler |
| An adiabatic quantum algorithm for finding marked vertices in a graph | QIP 2010 | Hari Krovi, Maris Ozols |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | organizing | member | — |
| TQC 2023 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2017 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2015 | organizing | chair | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Sophie Laplante | 5 |
| Atul Singh Arora | 4 |
| Maris Ozols | 4 |
| Chrysoula Vlachou | 3 |
| Hari Krovi | 3 |
| Joseph Cunningham | 3 |
| Loïck Magnin | 3 |
| Martin Rötteler | 3 |
| Shantanav Chakraborty | 3 |
| Alexandre Nolin | 2 |
| Gabriel Ignacio Senno | 2 |
| Julien Degorre | 2 |
| Leonardo Novo | 2 |
| Mathieu Brandeho | 2 |
| Mathieu Lauriere | 2 |
| Stephan Weis | 2 |
| Atul Arora | 1 |
| Benoît Dubus | 1 |
| Boris Altshuler | 1 |
| David Xiao | 1 |