4
program roles
1
organizing role
43
collaborators
2008–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
14 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Quantum advantage from soft decoders ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular ▸ presenter | Jean-Pierre Tillich |
In the last years, Regev's reduction has been used as a quantum algorithmic tool for providing a quantum advantage for variants of the decoding problem. Following this line of work, the authors of [JSW+24] have recently come up with a quantum algorithm called ``decoded quantum interferometry'' that is able to solve in polynomial time several optimization problems. They study in particular the Optimal Polynomial Interpolation (OPI) problem, which can be seen as a decoding problem on Reed-Solomon codes. In this work, we provide strong improvements for some instantiations of the OPI problem. The most notable improvements are for the ISIS_\infty problem (originating from lattice-based cryptography) on Reed-Solomon codes but we also study different constraints for OPI. Our results provide natural and convincing decoding problems for which we believe to have a quantum advantage. Our proof techniques involve the use of a soft decoder for Reed-Solomon codes, namely the decoding algorithm from Koetter and Vardy. In order to be able to use this decoder in the setting of Regev's reduction, we provide a novel generic reduction from a syndrome decoding problem to a coset sampling problem, providing a powerful and simple to use theorem, which generalizes previous work and is of independent interest. We also provide an extensive study of OPI using the Koetter and Vardy algorithm. |
|||
| Quantum algorithms for codes and lattices based on Regev's reduction | TQC 2025 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| The Quantum Decoding Problem | TQC 2024 | regular | Jean-Pierre Tillich |
One of the founding results of lattice based cryptography is a quantum reduction from the Short Integer Solution (SIS) problem to the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem introduced by Regev. It has recently been pointed out by Chen, Liu and Zhandry[CLZ22] that this reduction can be made more powerful by replacing the LWE problem with a quantum equivalent, where the errors are given in quantum superposition. In parallel, Regev's reduction has recently been adapted in the context of code-based cryptography by Debris, Remaud and Tillich[DRT23], who showed a reduction between the Short Codeword Problem and the Decoding Problem (the DRT reduction). This motivates the study of the Quantum Decoding Problem (QDP), which is the Decoding Problem but with errors in quantum superposition and see how it behaves in the DRT reduction. The purpose of this paper is to introduce and to lay a firm foundation for QDP. We first show QD Pis likely to be easier than classical decoding, by proving that it can be solved in quantum polynomial time in a large regime of noise whereas no non-exponential quantum algorithm is known for the classical decoding problem. Then, we show that QDP can even be solved (albeit not necessarily efficiently) beyond the information theoretic Shannon limit for classical decoding. We give precisely the largest noise level where we can solve QDP giving in a sense the information theoretic limit for this new problem. Finally, we study how QDP can be used in the DRT reduction. First, we show that our algorithms can be properly used in the DRT reduction showing that our quantum algorithms for QDP beyond Shannon capacity can be used to find minimal weight codewords in a random code. On the negative side, we show that the DRT reduction cannot be, in all generality, a reduction between finding small codewords and QDP by exhibiting quantum algorithms for QDP where this reduction entirely fails. Our proof techniques include the use of specific quantum measurements, such as q-ary unambiguous state discrimination and pretty good measurements as well as strong concentration bounds on weight distribution of random shifted dual codes, which we relate using quantum Fourier analysis. |
|||
| A note on the quantum query complexity of permutation symmetric functions | QIP 2019 | regular ▸ presenter | — |
| Experimental verification of multipartite entanglement in the presence of dishonest parties | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Will McCutcheon, Anna Pappa, Bryn Bell, Alex McMillan, Thomas Lawson, Mhlambululi Mafu, Damian Markham, Eleni Diamanti, Iordanis Kerenidis, John Rarity, Mark Tame |
| Experimental plug and play quantum coin flipping | QCRYPT 2014 | regular | ▸Anna Pappa, Paul Jouguet, Thomas Lawson, Matthieu Legré, Patrick Trinkler, Iordanis Kerenidis, Eleni Diamanti |
| Parallel repetition of entangled games with exponential decay via the superposed information cost | QIP 2014 | regular ▸ presenter | Giannicola Scarpa |
| Graph-theoretical Bounds on the Entangled Value of Non-local Games | TQC 2014 | regular | Laura Mančinska, Giannicola Scarpa, Simone Severini |
| Optimal Bounds for Parity-Oblivious Random Access Codes with Applications | TQC 2014 | regular | Iordanis Kerenidis, Srijita Kundu, Jamie Sikora |
|
Optimal Bounds for Quantum Bit Commitment ↗
|
QIP 2012 | invited | Iordanis Kerenidis |
| The Complexity of the Separable Hamiltonian Problem | QIP 2012 | regular | Or Sattath |
| Verifying multipartite entanglement in the presence of dishonest parties | TQC 2012 | regular | Eleni Diamanti, Iordanis Kerenidis, Anna Pappa, Stephanie Wehner |
| Mistrustful Quantum Cryptography in a Device-Independent Setting | TQC 2011 | regular | ▸Jonathan Silman, Nati Aharon, Iordanis Kerenidis, Stefano Pironio, Serge Massar |
Device-independent cryptographic protocols are by definition more secure than their device-dependent counterparts, since they do not rely on any assumptions regarding the internal workings of the apparatus used to implement them. Thus far, the device-independent approach has been successfully applied to problems such as quantum-key distribution and randomness generation, but it is not a priori clear whether it can be applied to protocols in the mistrustful cryptography class, where the parties do not trust one another. In this work we show that for bit-commitment and coin flipping a device-independent treatment is possible. |
|||
|
Quantum coin flipping ↗
|
QIP 2010 | invited | — |
21 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Fine-Grained Unambiguous Measurements | QIP 2026 | ▸Quentin Buzet |
| On the Quantum Equivalence between S|LWE⟩ and ISIS | QIP 2026 | ▸Paul Hermouet |
| The Quantum Decoding Problem : Tight Achievability Bounds and Application to Regev’s Reduction | QIP 2026 | ▸Agathe Blanvillain, Jean-Pierre Tillich |
| Widening Simon-based Attacks | QIP 2023 | Paul Frixons, María Naya-Plasencia, Ritam Bhaumik |
| Breaking simple quantum position verification protocols with little entanglement | QCRYPT 2020 | Andrea Olivo, Ulysse Chabaud, Frédéric Grosshans |
Position verification is a cryptographic primitive aiming at securely certifying the location of a party in space. Informationally-secure PV was shown to be impossible through the existence of universal attacks both in the classical setting [Chandran et al., 2009] and in the quantum setting [Buhrman et al., 2014; Beigi and König,2011]. However, while classical attacks require the same amount of resources than the protocol, known universal quantum attacks make use of an exponential amount of entanglement through a technique known as Instantaneous Nonlocal Quantum Computation. In this paper, we characterize attacks to a "BB84-like" protocol already proposed in previous work [Kent et al., 2011], based on single photons polarized at an angle θ. We consider adversaries sharing maximally entangled pairs of qudits and find low-dimensional INQC attacks. We find exact attacks against some rational angles, including some sitting outside of the Clifford hierarchy (e.g. π/6), and show no θ allows to tolerate errors higher than ~0.5% against adversaries holding two ebits per protocol's qubit. |
||
| An Efficient Quantum Collision Search Algorithm and Implications on Symmetric Cryptography | QIP 2018 | María Naya-Plasencia, André Schrottenloher |
| The information cost of quantum memoryless protocols | QIP 2018 | Iordanis Kerenidis, Mathieu Lauriere |
| SURF: A new quantum-safe code-based signature scheme with a tight security reduction in the quantum random oracle model | QIP 2018 | Thomas Debris-Alazard, Nicolas Sendrier, Jean-Pierre Tillich |
| Robust Relativistic Bit Commitment | QIP 2017 | Kaushik Chakraborty, Anthony Leverrier |
| Relativistic (or 2-prover 1-round) zero- knowledge protocol for NP secure against quantum adversaries | QIP 2017 | Anthony Leverrier |
| The information cost of quantum memoryless protocols | TQC 2017 | Iordanis Kerenidis, Mathieu Lauriere |
| Relativistic string commitment secure against quantum adversaries | QIP 2016 | Kaushik Chakraborty, Anthony Leverrier |
| Optimal bounds for quantum weak oblivious transfer | QIP 2014 | Gus Gutoski, Jamie Sikora |
| Strong connections between quantum encodings, non-locality and non-contextuality | QIP 2014 | Iordanis Kerenidis, Srijita Kundu, Jamie Sikora |
| Adversarial Multipartite Entanglement Verification in realistic conditions. | QIP 2013 | Anna Pappa, Thomas Lawson, Eleni Diamanti, Iordanis Kerenidis |
| Adversarial multipartite entanglement verification in realistic conditions | QCRYPT 2012 | Anna Pappa, Thomas Lawson, Stephanie Wehner |
| Practical Quantum Coin Flipping | QCRYPT 2011 | Anna Pappa, Eleni Diamanti, Iordanis Kerenidis |
| Quantum commitments from complexity assumptions | QIP 2011 | Iordanis Kerenidis, Bill Rosgen |
| Lower bounds for quantum oblivious transfer | QIP 2011 | Iordanis Kerenidis, Jamie Sikora |
| The role of help in Classical and Quantum Zero-Knowledge | QIP 2008 | Iordanis Kerenidis |
| Honest-Verifier Quantum Statistical Zero Knowledge for all Interactive Protocols | QIP 2008 | Iordanis Kerenidis |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2019 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2017 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2017 | organizing | member | — |
| TQC 2016 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Iordanis Kerenidis | 15 |
| Anna Pappa | 6 |
| Eleni Diamanti | 5 |
| Jamie Sikora | 4 |
| Jean-Pierre Tillich | 4 |
| Thomas Lawson | 4 |
| Anthony Leverrier | 3 |
| Giannicola Scarpa | 2 |
| Kaushik Chakraborty | 2 |
| María Naya-Plasencia | 2 |
| Mathieu Lauriere | 2 |
| Srijita Kundu | 2 |
| Stephanie Wehner | 2 |
| Agathe Blanvillain | 1 |
| Alex McMillan | 1 |
| Andrea Olivo | 1 |
| André Schrottenloher | 1 |
| Bill Rosgen | 1 |
| Bryn Bell | 1 |
| Damian Markham | 1 |