13
collaborators
2020–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
5 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| A New World in the Depths of Microcrypt: Separating OWSGs and Quantum Money from QEFID | TQC 2025 | regular | Giulio Malavolta, Tomoyuki Morimae, Tamer Mour, Takashi Yamakawa |
| Copy-Protecting Puncturable Functionalities, Revisited | TQC 2025 | regular | Prabhanjan Ananth, Zikuan Huang |
| Pseudorandomness with Proof of Destruction and Applications | QCRYPT 2023 | regular ▸ presenter | Zvika Brakerski, Or Sattath, Omri Shmueli |
Two fundamental properties of quantum states that quantum information theory explores are pseudorandomness and provability of destruction. We introduce the notion of quantum pseudorandom states with proofs of destruction (PRSPD) that combines both these properties. Like standard pseudorandom states (PRS), these are efficiently generated quantum states that are indistinguishable from random, but they can also be measured to create a classical string. This string is verifiable (given the secret key) and certifies that the state has been destructed. We show that, similarly to PRS, PRSPD can be constructed from any post-quantum one-way function. As far as the authors are aware, this is the first construction of a family of states that satisfies both pseudorandomness and provability of destruction. We show that many cryptographic applications that were shown based on PRS variants using quantum communication can be based on (variants of) PRSPD using only classical communication. This includes symmetric encryption, message authentication, one-time signatures, commitments, and classically verifiable private quantum coins. |
|||
| Noise-Tolerant Quantum Tokens for MAC | TQC 2022 | regular ▸ presenter | Uriel Shinar, Or Sattath |
| Almost Public Quantum Coins | QIP 2021 | regular | Or Sattath |
Abstract In a quantum money scheme, a bank can issue money that users cannot counterfeit. Similar to bills of paper money, most quantum money schemes assign a unique serial number to each money state, thus potentially compromising the privacy of the users of quantum money. However in a quantum coins scheme, just like the traditional currency coin scheme, all the money states are exact copies of each other, providing a better level of privacy for the users. A quantum money scheme can be private, i.e., only the bank can verify the money states, or public, meaning anyone can verify. In this work, we propose a way to lift any private quantum coin scheme -- which is known to exist based on the existence of one-way functions by Ji, Liu, and Song (CRYPTO'18) -- to a scheme that closely resembles a public quantum coin scheme. Verification of a new coin is done by comparing it to the coins the user already possesses, by using a projector on to the symmetric subspace. No public coin scheme was known prior to this work. It is also the first construction that is close to a public quantum money scheme and is provably secure based on standard assumptions. The lifting technique when instantiated with the private quantum coins scheme by Mosca and Stebila (2010) gives rise to the first construction that is close to an inefficient unconditionally secure public quantum money scheme. |
|||
5 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Modular Approach to Unclonable Cryptography | QCRYPT 2024 | Prabhanjan Ananth |
We explore a new pathway to designing unclonable cryptographic primitives. We propose a new notion called unclonable puncturable obfuscation (UPO) and study its implications for unclonable cryptography. Using UPO, we present modular (and in some cases, arguably, simple) constructions of many primitives in unclonable cryptography, including, public-key quantum money, quantum copy-protection for many classes of functionalities, unclonable encryption, and single-decryption encryption. |
||
| Signatures From Pseudorandom States via ⊥-PRFs | QCRYPT 2024 | Mohammed Barhoush, Lior Ozer, Louis Salvail, Or Sattath |
Different flavors of quantum pseudorandomness have proven useful for various cryptographic applications, with the compelling feature that these primitives are potentially weaker than post-quantum one-way functions. Ananth, Lin, and Yuen (2023) have shown that logarithmic pseudorandom states can be used to construct a pseudo-deterministic PRG: informally, for a fixed seed, the output is the same with 1 − 1/poly probability. In this work, we introduce new definitions for ⊥-PRG and ⊥-PRF. The correctness guarantees are that, for a fixed seed, except with negligible probability, the output is either the same (with probability 1 − 1/poly) or recognizable abort, denoted ⊥. Our approach admits a natural definition of multi-time PRG security, as well as the adaptive security of a PRF. We construct a ⊥-PRG from any pseudo-deterministic PRG and, from that, a ⊥-PRF. Even though most mini-crypt primitives, such as symmetric key encryption, commitments, MAC, and length-restricted one-time digital signatures, have been shown based on various quantum pseudorandomness assumptions, digital signatures remained elusive. Our main application is a (quantum) digital signature scheme with classical public keys and signatures, thereby addressing a previously unresolved question posed in Morimae and Yamakawa’s work (Crypto, 2022). Additionally, we construct CPA secure public-key encryption with tamper-resilient quantum public keys. |
||
| Signatures From Pseudorandom States via bot-PRFs | TQC 2024 | Mohammed Barhoush, Lior Ozer, Louis Salvail, Or Sattath |
| Noise-Tolerant Quantum Tokens for MAC | QCRYPT 2021 | Or Sattath, Uriel Shinar |
Message Authentication Code or MAC, is a well-studied cryptographic primitive that is used in order to authenticate communication between two parties sharing a secret key. A Tokenized MAC or TMAC is a related cryptographic primitive, introduced by Ben-David & Sattath (QCrypt'17) which allows to delegate limited signing authority to third parties via the use of single-use quantum signing tokens. These tokens can be issued using the secret key, such that each token can be used to sign at most one document. We provide an elementary construction for TMAC based on BB84 states. Our construction can tolerate up to 14% noise, making it the first noise-tolerant TMAC construction. The simplicity of the quantum states required for our construction combined with the noise-tolerance, makes it practically more feasible than the previous TMAC construction. The TMAC is existentially unforgeable against adversaries with signing and verification oracles (i.e., analogous to EUF-CMA security for MAC), assuming post-quantum collision-resistant hash functions exist. |
||
| Almost Public Quantum Coins | QCRYPT 2020 | Or Sattath |
In a quantum money scheme, a bank can issue money that users cannot counterfeit. Similar to bills of paper money, most quantum money schemes assign a unique serial number to each money state, thus potentially compromising the privacy of the users of quantum money. However in a quantum coins scheme, just like the traditional currency coin scheme, all the money states are exact copies of each other, providing a better level of privacy for the users. A quantum money scheme can be private, i.e., only the bank can verify the money states, or public, meaning anyone can verify. In this work, we propose a way to lift any private quantum coin scheme -- which is known to exist based on the existence of one-way functions, due to Ji, Liu, and Song (CRYPTO'18) -- to a scheme that closely resembles a public quantum coin scheme. Verification of a new coin is done by comparing it to the coins the user already possesses, by using a projector on to the symmetric subspace. No public coin scheme was known prior to this work. It is also the first construction that is very close to a public quantum money scheme and is provably secure based on standard assumptions. The lifting technique when instantiated with the private quantum coins scheme, due to Mosca and Stebila 2010, gives rise to the first construction that is very close to an inefficient unconditionally secure public quantum money scheme. |
||
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Or Sattath | 7 |
| Lior Ozer | 2 |
| Louis Salvail | 2 |
| Mohammed Barhoush | 2 |
| Prabhanjan Ananth | 2 |
| Uriel Shinar | 2 |
| Giulio Malavolta | 1 |
| Omri Shmueli | 1 |
| Takashi Yamakawa | 1 |
| Tamer Mour | 1 |
| Tomoyuki Morimae | 1 |
| Zikuan Huang | 1 |
| Zvika Brakerski | 1 |