3
steering roles
22
collaborators
2001–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
4 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm at High Depth for MaxCut on Large-Girth Regular Graphs and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model
Outstanding Paper Award
|
TQC 2022 | regular | Joao Basso, Kunal Marwaha, Benjamin Villalonga, Leo Zhou |
| The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model at Infinite Size | QIP 2021 | regular | Jeffrey Goldstone, Sam Gutmann, Leo Zhou |
Abstract The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a general-purpose algorithm for combinatorial optimization problems whose performance can only improve with the number of layers p. While QAOA holds promise as an algorithm that can be run on near-term quantum computers, its computational power has not been fully explored. In this work, we study the QAOA applied to the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model, which can be understood as energy minimization of n spins with all-to-all random signed couplings. There is a recent classical algorithm by Montanari that, assuming a widely believed conjecture, can be tailored to efficiently find an approximate solution for a typical instance of the SK model to within (1-epsilon) times the ground state energy. We can only hope to match its performance with the QAOA. Our main result is a novel technique that allows us to evaluate the typical-instance energy of the QAOA applied to the SK model. We produce a formula for the expected value of the energy, as a function of the 2p QAOA parameters, in the infinite size limit that can be evaluated on a computer with O(16^p) complexity. We evaluate the formula up to p=12, and find that the QAOA at p=11 outperforms the standard semidefinite programming algorithm. Moreover, we show concentration: With probability tending to one as n goes to infinity, measurements of the QAOA will produce strings whose energies concentrate at our calculated value. As an algorithm running on a quantum computer, there is no need to search for optimal parameters on an instance-by-instance basis since we can determine them in advance. What we have here is a new framework for analyzing the QAOA, and our techniques can be of broad interest for evaluating its performance on more general problems where classical algorithms may fail. |
|||
| Speedup by quantum walk | QIP 2003 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution | QIP 2001 | invited | — |
9 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Lower bounding the MaxCut of high girth 3-regular graphs using the QAOA | QIP 2026 | Sam Gutmann, Daniel Ranard, ▸Benjamin Villalonga |
| Lower bounding the MaxCut of high girth 3-regular graphs using the QAOA | TQC 2026 | Sam Gutmann, Daniel Ranard, Benjamin Villalonga |
We study MaxCut on 3-regular graphs of minimum girth g for various g’s. We obtain new lower bounds on the maximum cut achievable in such graphs by analyzing the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). For g ≥ 16, at depth p ≥ 7, the QAOA improves on previously known lower bounds. Our bounds are established through classical numerical analysis of the QAOA’s expected performance. This analysis does not produce the actual cuts but establishes their existence. When implemented on a quantum computer, the QAOA provides an efficient algorithm for finding such cuts, using a constant- depth quantum circuit. To our knowledge, this gives an exponential speedup over the best known classical algorithm guaranteed to achieve cuts of this size on graphs of this girth. Furthermore, our guaranteed cut fractions apply to random instances of large 3-regular graphs since they are effectively large girth for our purposes. We also apply the QAOA to the Maximum Independent Set problem on the same class of graphs. |
||
| Improving the QAOA using warm-starts generated by Goemans-Williamson | TQC 2024 | Brandon Augustino, Madelyn Cain, Swati Gupta, Sam Gutmann, Daniel Ranard, Eugene Tang, Katherine Van Kirk |
| The QAOA gets stuck starting from a good classical string | TQC 2023 | Madelyn Cain, Sam Gutmann, Daniel Ranard, Eugene Tang |
| Error suppression in Hamiltonian based quantum computation using energy penalties | QIP 2015 | Adam Bookatz, Leo Zhou |
| Different Strategies for Optimization Using the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm | QIP 2015 | Elizabeth Crosson, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Han-Hsuan Lin, Peter Shor |
| Unstructured randomness, small gaps and localization | QIP 2011 | Jeffrey Goldstone, David Gosset, Sam Gutmann, Peter Shor |
| Quantum Adiabatic Algorithms, Small Gaps, and Different Paths | QIP 2010 | Jeffrey Goldstone, David Gosset, Sam Gutmann, Harvey Meyer, Peter Shor |
| Quantum state restoration, or how to perform quantum state tomography with a single copy of a state | QIP 2010 | David Gosset, Avinatan Hassidim, Andrew Lutomirski, Daniel Nagaj, Peter Shor |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2012 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2011 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2010 | steering | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Sam Gutmann | 7 |
| Daniel Ranard | 4 |
| Peter Shor | 4 |
| Benjamin Villalonga | 3 |
| David Gosset | 3 |
| Jeffrey Goldstone | 3 |
| Leo Zhou | 3 |
| Eugene Tang | 2 |
| Madelyn Cain | 2 |
| Adam Bookatz | 1 |
| Andrew Lutomirski | 1 |
| Avinatan Hassidim | 1 |
| Brandon Augustino | 1 |
| Cedric Yen-Yu Lin | 1 |
| Daniel Nagaj | 1 |
| Elizabeth Crosson | 1 |
| Han-Hsuan Lin | 1 |
| Harvey Meyer | 1 |
| Joao Basso | 1 |
| Katherine Van Kirk | 1 |