5
talks
0
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2023–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layer codes as partially self-correcting quantum memories | QIP 2026 | regular | Shouzhen Gu, Libor Caha, Zhiyang He, Aleksander Kubica, Eugene Tang |
We investigate layer codes, a family of three-dimensional stabilizer codes that can achieve optimal scaling of code parameters and a polynomial energy barrier, as candidates for self-correcting quantum memories. First, we introduce two decoding algorithms for layer codes with provable guarantees for local stochastic and adversarial noise, respectively. We then prove that layer codes are partially self-correcting quantum memories. With memory times scaling exponentially in the linear size of the system, layer codes outperform the previously demonstrated subexponential scaling of the welded solid code. Notably, we argue that partial self-correction without the requirement of efficient decoding is more common than expected, as it arises from a diverging energy barrier. This draws a sharp distinction between partially self-correcting systems, and partially self-correcting memories. Another novel aspect of our work is an analysis of layer codes constructed from random Calderbank–Shor–Steane codes. We show that these random layer codes have optimal scaling (up to logarithmic corrections) of code parameters and a polynomial energy barrier. Finally, we present numerical studies of their memory times and report behavior consistent with partial self-correction. |
|||
| Tile codes ↗ | QIP 2026 | regular | Vincent Steffan, Nikolas Breuckmann, Francisco Revson Fernandes Pereira, Jens Niklas Eberhardt, Zijian Liang, Yu-An Chen |
We introduce tile codes, a simple yet powerful way of constructing quantum codes that are local on a planar 2D-lattice. Tile codes generalize the usual surface code by allowing for a bit more flexibility in terms of locality and stabilizer weight. Our construction does not compromise on the fact that the codes are local on a lattice with open boundary conditions. Despite its simplicity, we use our construction to find codes with parameters [[288,8,12]] using weight-6 stabilizers and [[288,8,14]] using weight-8 stabilizers, outperforming all previously known constructions in this direction. Allowing for a slightly higher non-locality, we find a [[512,18,19]] code using weight-8 stabilizers, which outperforms the rotated surface code by a factor of more than 12. Our approach provides a unified framework for understanding the structure of codes that are local on a 2D planar lattice and offers a systematic way to explore the space of possible code parameters. In particular, due to its simplicity, the construction naturally accommodates various types of boundary conditions and stabilizer configurations, making it a versatile tool for quantum error correction code design. |
|||
|
Single-shot decoding of good quantum LDPC codes ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Shouzhen Gu, Eugene Tang, Libor Caha, Zhiyang He, Aleksander Kubica |
Quantum Tanner codes constitute a family of quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes with good parameters, i.e., constant encoding rate and relative distance. In this article, we prove that quantum Tanner codes also facilitate single-shot quantum error correction (QEC) of adversarial noise, where one measurement round (consisting of constant-weight parity checks) suffices to perform reliable QEC even in the presence of measurement errors. We establish this result for both the sequential and parallel decoding algorithms introduced by Leverrier and Zemor. Furthermore, we show that in order to suppress errors over multiple repeated rounds of QEC, it suffices to run the parallel decoding algorithm for constant time in each round. Combined with good code parameters, the resulting constant-time overhead of QEC and robustness to (possibly time-correlated) adversarial noise make quantum Tanner codes alluring from the perspective of quantum fault-tolerant protocols. |
|||
|
How to fault-tolerantly realize any quantum circuit with local operations ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Robert König |
We show how to realize a general quantum circuit involving gates between arbitrary pairs of qubits by means of geometrically local quantum operations and efficient classical computation. We prove that circuit-level local stochastic noise modeling an imperfect implementation of our derived schemes is equivalent to local stochastic noise in the original circuit. Our constructions incur a constant-factor increase in the quantum circuit depth and a polynomial overhead in the number of qubits: To execute an arbitrary quantum circuit on n qubits, we give a 3D quantum fault-tolerance architecture involving O(n^3/2 log^3 n) qubits, and a quasi-2D architecture using O(n^2 log^3 n) qubits. Applied to recent fault-tolerance constructions, this gives a fault-tolerance threshold theorem for universal quantum computations with local operations, a polynomial qubit overhead and a quasi-polylogarithmic depth overhead. More generally, our transformation dispenses with the need for considering the locality of operations when designing schemes for fault-tolerant quantum information processing. |
|||
| Long-range data transmission in a fault-tolerant quantum bus architecture | QIP 2023 | regular ▸ presenter | Robert Koenig |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Aleksander Kubica | 2 |
| Eugene Tang | 2 |
| Libor Caha | 2 |
| Shouzhen Gu | 2 |
| Zhiyang He | 2 |
| Francisco Revson Fernandes Pereira | 1 |
| Jens Niklas Eberhardt | 1 |
| Nikolas Breuckmann | 1 |
| Robert Koenig | 1 |
| Robert König | 1 |
| Vincent Steffan | 1 |
| Yu-An Chen | 1 |
| Zijian Liang | 1 |