5
talks
0
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2024–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layer codes as partially self-correcting quantum memories | QIP 2026 | regular | Shouzhen Gu, Shin Ho Choe, Zhiyang He, Aleksander Kubica, Eugene Tang |
We investigate layer codes, a family of three-dimensional stabilizer codes that can achieve optimal scaling of code parameters and a polynomial energy barrier, as candidates for self-correcting quantum memories. First, we introduce two decoding algorithms for layer codes with provable guarantees for local stochastic and adversarial noise, respectively. We then prove that layer codes are partially self-correcting quantum memories. With memory times scaling exponentially in the linear size of the system, layer codes outperform the previously demonstrated subexponential scaling of the welded solid code. Notably, we argue that partial self-correction without the requirement of efficient decoding is more common than expected, as it arises from a diverging energy barrier. This draws a sharp distinction between partially self-correcting systems, and partially self-correcting memories. Another novel aspect of our work is an analysis of layer codes constructed from random Calderbank–Shor–Steane codes. We show that these random layer codes have optimal scaling (up to logarithmic corrections) of code parameters and a polynomial energy barrier. Finally, we present numerical studies of their memory times and report behavior consistent with partial self-correction. |
|||
| Factoring an integer with three oscillators and a qubit | TQC 2025 | regular | Lukas Brenner, Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Robert Koenig |
| The complexity of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states | TQC 2025 | regular | Lukas Brenner, Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Robert Koenig |
|
Single-shot decoding of good quantum LDPC codes ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Shouzhen Gu, Eugene Tang, Shin Ho Choe, Zhiyang He, Aleksander Kubica |
Quantum Tanner codes constitute a family of quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes with good parameters, i.e., constant encoding rate and relative distance. In this article, we prove that quantum Tanner codes also facilitate single-shot quantum error correction (QEC) of adversarial noise, where one measurement round (consisting of constant-weight parity checks) suffices to perform reliable QEC even in the presence of measurement errors. We establish this result for both the sequential and parallel decoding algorithms introduced by Leverrier and Zemor. Furthermore, we show that in order to suppress errors over multiple repeated rounds of QEC, it suffices to run the parallel decoding algorithm for constant time in each round. Combined with good code parameters, the resulting constant-time overhead of QEC and robustness to (possibly time-correlated) adversarial noise make quantum Tanner codes alluring from the perspective of quantum fault-tolerant protocols. |
|||
|
A colossal advantage: 3D-local noisy shallow quantum circuits defeat unbounded fan-in classical circuits ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Robert Koenig |
We present a computational problem with the following properties: (i) Every instance can be solved with near-certainty by a constant-depth quantum circuit using only nearest-neighbor gates in 3D even when its implementation is corrupted by noise. (ii) Any constant-depth classical circuit composed of unbounded fan-in AND, OR, as well as NOT gates, i.e., an AC0-circuit, of size smaller than a certain subexponential, fails to solve a uniformly random instance with probability greater than a certain constant. Such an advantage against unbounded fan-in classical circuits was previously only known in the noise-free case or without locality constraints. We overcome these limitations, proposing a quantum advantage demonstration amenable to experimental realizations. Subexponential circuit-complexity lower bounds have traditionally been referred to as exponential. We use the term colossal since our fault-tolerant 3D architecture resembles a certain Roman monument. |
|||
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Robert Koenig | 3 |
| Xavier Coiteux-Roy | 3 |
| Aleksander Kubica | 2 |
| Eugene Tang | 2 |
| Lukas Brenner | 2 |
| Shin Ho Choe | 2 |
| Shouzhen Gu | 2 |
| Zhiyang He | 2 |