13
collaborators
2010–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
1 Talk
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model at Infinite Size | QIP 2021 | regular | Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Leo Zhou |
Abstract The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a general-purpose algorithm for combinatorial optimization problems whose performance can only improve with the number of layers p. While QAOA holds promise as an algorithm that can be run on near-term quantum computers, its computational power has not been fully explored. In this work, we study the QAOA applied to the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model, which can be understood as energy minimization of n spins with all-to-all random signed couplings. There is a recent classical algorithm by Montanari that, assuming a widely believed conjecture, can be tailored to efficiently find an approximate solution for a typical instance of the SK model to within (1-epsilon) times the ground state energy. We can only hope to match its performance with the QAOA. Our main result is a novel technique that allows us to evaluate the typical-instance energy of the QAOA applied to the SK model. We produce a formula for the expected value of the energy, as a function of the 2p QAOA parameters, in the infinite size limit that can be evaluated on a computer with O(16^p) complexity. We evaluate the formula up to p=12, and find that the QAOA at p=11 outperforms the standard semidefinite programming algorithm. Moreover, we show concentration: With probability tending to one as n goes to infinity, measurements of the QAOA will produce strings whose energies concentrate at our calculated value. As an algorithm running on a quantum computer, there is no need to search for optimal parameters on an instance-by-instance basis since we can determine them in advance. What we have here is a new framework for analyzing the QAOA, and our techniques can be of broad interest for evaluating its performance on more general problems where classical algorithms may fail. |
|||
5 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Lower bounding the MaxCut of high girth 3-regular graphs using the QAOA | QIP 2026 | Edward Farhi, Daniel Ranard, ▸Benjamin Villalonga |
| Improving the QAOA using warm-starts generated by Goemans-Williamson | TQC 2024 | Brandon Augustino, Madelyn Cain, Edward Farhi, Swati Gupta, Daniel Ranard, Eugene Tang, Katherine Van Kirk |
| The QAOA gets stuck starting from a good classical string | TQC 2023 | Madelyn Cain, Edward Farhi, Daniel Ranard, Eugene Tang |
| Unstructured randomness, small gaps and localization | QIP 2011 | Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, David Gosset, Peter Shor |
| Quantum Adiabatic Algorithms, Small Gaps, and Different Paths | QIP 2010 | Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, David Gosset, Harvey Meyer, Peter Shor |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Edward Farhi | 6 |
| Daniel Ranard | 3 |
| Jeffrey Goldstone | 3 |
| David Gosset | 2 |
| Eugene Tang | 2 |
| Madelyn Cain | 2 |
| Peter Shor | 2 |
| Benjamin Villalonga | 1 |
| Brandon Augustino | 1 |
| Harvey Meyer | 1 |
| Katherine Van Kirk | 1 |
| Leo Zhou | 1 |
| Swati Gupta | 1 |