3
talks
0
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2024–2024
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Learning Quantum States With Respect to the Stabilizer Formalism | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Sabee Grewal, Vishnu Iyer, William Kretschmer |
|
Pseudoentanglement Ain't Cheap ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Sabee Grewal, Vishnu Iyer, William Kretschmer |
We show that any pseudoentangled state ensemble with a gap of t bits of entropy requires Ω(t) non-Clifford gates to prepare. This bound is tight up to polylogarithmic factors if linear-time quantum-secure pseudorandom functions exist. Our result follows from a polynomial-time algorithm to estimate the entanglement entropy of a quantum state across any cut of qubits. When run on an n-qubit state that is stabilized by at least 2^n−t Pauli operators, our algorithm produces an estimate that is within an additive factor of t/2 bits of the true entanglement entropy. |
|||
|
Quantum State Learning Implies Circuit Lower Bounds ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Nai-Hui Chia, Fang Song |
We establish connections between state tomography, pseudorandomness, quantum state synthesis, and circuit lower bounds. In particular, let C be a family of non-uniform quantum circuits of polynomial size and suppose that there exists an algorithm that, given copies of |ψ⟩, distinguishes whether |ψ⟩ is produced by C or is Haar random, promised one of these is the case. For arbitrary fixed constant c, we show that if the algorithm uses at most O(2^n^c) time and 2^n^0.99 samples then stateBQE⊄stateC. Here stateBQE:=stateBQTIME[2^O(n)] and stateC are state synthesis complexity classes as introduced by Rosenthal and Yuen (ITCS 2022), which capture problems with classical inputs but quantum output. Note that efficient tomography implies a similarly efficient distinguishing algorithm against Haar random states, even for nearly exponential-time algorithms. Because every state produced by a polynomial-size circuit can be learned with 2O(n) samples and time, or O(n^ω(1)) samples and 2^O(n^ω(1)) time, we show that even slightly non-trivial quantum state tomography algorithms would lead to new statements about quantum state synthesis. Finally, a slight modification of our proof shows that distinguishing algorithms for quantum states can imply circuit lower bounds for decision problems as well. This help sheds light on why time-efficient tomography algorithms for non-uniform quantum circuit classes has only had limited and partial progress. Our work parallels results by Arunachalam et al. (FOCS 2021) that revealed a similar connection between quantum learning of Boolean functions and circuit lower bounds for classical circuit classes, but modified for the purposes of state tomography and state synthesis. |
|||
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Sabee Grewal | 2 |
| Vishnu Iyer | 2 |
| William Kretschmer | 2 |
| Fang Song | 1 |
| Nai-Hui Chia | 1 |