8
talks
3
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2021–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Topological Quantum Spin Glass Order in qLDPC codes ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | Benedikt Placke, Tibor Rakovszky, Vedika Khemani |
Ordered phases of matter have close connections to computation. Two prominent examples are spin glass order, with wide-ranging applications in machine learning and optimization, and topological order, closely related to quantum error correction. Here, we introduce the concept of topological quantum spin glass (TQSG) order which marries these two notions, exhibiting both the complex energy landscapes of spin glasses, and the quantum memory and long-range entanglement characteristic of topologically ordered systems. Using techniques from coding theory and a quantum generalization of Gibbs state decompositions, we show that TQSG order is the low-temperature phase of various quantum low density parity check codes on expander graphs, including hypergraph and balanced product codes.
Our work introduces a topological analog of spin glasses that preserves quantum information via a physically distinct mechanism, opening new avenues for both quantum statistical mechanics and quantum computer science. |
|||
| Tile codes ↗ | QIP 2026 | regular | Vincent Steffan, Shin Ho Choe, Francisco Revson Fernandes Pereira, Jens Niklas Eberhardt, Zijian Liang, Yu-An Chen |
We introduce tile codes, a simple yet powerful way of constructing quantum codes that are local on a planar 2D-lattice. Tile codes generalize the usual surface code by allowing for a bit more flexibility in terms of locality and stabilizer weight. Our construction does not compromise on the fact that the codes are local on a lattice with open boundary conditions. Despite its simplicity, we use our construction to find codes with parameters [[288,8,12]] using weight-6 stabilizers and [[288,8,14]] using weight-8 stabilizers, outperforming all previously known constructions in this direction. Allowing for a slightly higher non-locality, we find a [[512,18,19]] code using weight-8 stabilizers, which outperforms the rotated surface code by a factor of more than 12. Our approach provides a unified framework for understanding the structure of codes that are local on a 2D planar lattice and offers a systematic way to explore the space of possible code parameters. In particular, due to its simplicity, the construction naturally accommodates various types of boundary conditions and stabilizer configurations, making it a versatile tool for quantum error correction code design. |
|||
| Circuit-to-Hamiltonian from tensor networks and fault tolerance | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Anurag Anshu, Quynh Nguyen |
| NLTS Hamiltonians from good quantum codes | QIP 2023 | plenary_long | Anurag Anshu, ▸Chinmay Nirkhe |
| Balanced Product Quantum Codes | QIP 2022 | plenary_short ▸ presenter | Jens Eberhardt |
| Subsystem codes with high thresholds by gauge fixing and reduced qubit overhead | QIP 2021 | regular | Oscar Higgott |
Abstract We introduce a technique that uses gauge fixing to significantly improve the quantum error correcting performance of subsystem codes. By changing the order in which check operators are measured, valuable additional information can be gained, and we introduce a new method for decoding which uses this information to improve performance. Applied to the subsystem toric code with three-qubit check operators, we increase the threshold under circuit-level depolarising noise from 0.67% to 0.81%. The threshold increases further under a circuit-level noise model with small finite bias, up to 2.22% for infinite bias. Furthermore, we construct families of finite-rate subsystem LDPC codes with three-qubit check operators and optimal-depth parity-check measurement schedules. To the best of our knowledge, these finite-rate subsystem codes outperform all known codes at circuit-level depolarising error rates as high as 0.2%, where they have a qubit overhead that is 4.3× lower than the most efficient version of the surface code and 5.1× lower than the subsystem toric code. Their threshold and pseudo-threshold exceeds 0.42% for circuit-level depolarising noise, increasing to 2.4% under infinite bias using gauge fixing. |
|||
| Subsystem codes with high thresholds by gauge fixing and reduced qubit overhead | TQC 2021 | regular | Oscar Higgott |
| Balanced Product Quantum Codes | TQC 2021 | regular | Jens Eberhardt |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2025 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2024 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Anurag Anshu | 2 |
| Jens Eberhardt | 2 |
| Oscar Higgott | 2 |
| Benedikt Placke | 1 |
| Chinmay Nirkhe | 1 |
| Francisco Revson Fernandes Pereira | 1 |
| Jens Niklas Eberhardt | 1 |
| Quynh Nguyen | 1 |
| Shin Ho Choe | 1 |
| Tibor Rakovszky | 1 |
| Vedika Khemani | 1 |
| Vincent Steffan | 1 |
| Yu-An Chen | 1 |
| Zijian Liang | 1 |