15
talks
7
committee roles
1
leadership roles
2008–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Efficient self-consistent learning of gate set Pauli noise | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Senrui Chen, Zhihan Zhang, Liang Jiang |
| Fiber Bundle Fault Tolerance of GKP Codes | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Ansgar Burchards, Jonathan Conrad |
| Chasing shadows with Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes | TQC 2025 | regular | Jonathan Conrad, Jens Eisert |
| Free fermions behind the disguise | QIP 2022 | regular | Samuel Elman, ▸Adrian Chapman |
| Learning from noisy quantum experiments | QIP 2022 | regular | ▸Hsin-Yuan Huang, John Preskill |
| Characterization of solvable spin models via graph invariants | QIP 2021 | regular | Adrian Chapman |
Abstract Exactly solvable models are essential in physics. For many-body spin-1/2 systems, an important class of such models consists of those that can be mapped to free fermions hopping on a graph. We provide a complete characterization of models which can be solved this way. Specifically, we reduce the problem of recognizing such spin models to the graph-theoretic problem of recognizing line graphs, which has been solved optimally. A corollary of our result is a complete set of constant-sized commutation structures that constitute the obstructions to a free-fermion solution. We find that symmetries are tightly constrained in these models. Pauli symmetries correspond to either: (i) cycles on the fermion hopping graph, (ii) the fermion parity operator, or (iii) logically encoded qubits. Clifford symmetries within one of these symmetry sectors, with three exceptions, must be symmetries of the free-fermion model itself. We demonstrate how several exact free-fermion solutions from the literature fit into our formalism and give an explicit example of a new model previously unknown to be solvable by free fermions |
|||
| Quantum coding with low-depth random circuits | QIP 2021 | regular | Michael Gullans, Stefan Krastanov, David Huse, Liang Jiang |
Abstract Random quantum circuits have played a central role in establishing the computational advantages of near-term quantum computers over their conventional counterparts. Here, we use ensembles of low-depth random circuits with local connectivity in D spatial dimensions to generate quantum error-correcting codes. For random stabilizer codes and the erasure channel, we find strong evidence that a depth O(logN) random circuit is necessary and sufficient to converge (with high probability) to zero failure probability for any finite amount below the channel capacity for any D. Previous results on random circuits have only shown that O(N^1/D) depth suffices or that O(log^3 N) depth suffices for all-to-all connectivity. We then study the critical behavior of the erasure threshold in the so-called moderate deviation limit, where both the failure probability and the distance to the channel capacity converge to zero with N. We find that the requisite depth scales like O(log N) only for dimensions D=2, and that random circuits require O(N^1/2) depth for D=1. Finally, we introduce an "expurgation" algorithm that uses quantum measurements to remove logical operators that cause the code to fail by turning them into either additional stabilizers or into gauge operators in a subsystem code. With such targeted measurements, we can achieve sub-logarithmic depth in D=2 spatial dimensions below capacity without increasing the maximum weight of the check operators. We find that for any rate beneath the capacity, high-performing codes with thousands of logical qubits are achievable with depth 4-8 expurgated random circuits in D=2 dimensions. These results indicate that finite-rate quantum codes are practically relevant for near-term devices and may significantly reduce the resource requirements to achieve fault tolerance for near-term applications. |
|||
| 10:00 - 10:30 | The XZZX surface code | QIP 2021 | regular | Pablo Bonilla Ataides, David Tuckett, Stephen Bartlett, Benjamin Brown |
Abstract We show that a variant of the surface code---the XZZX code---offers remarkable performance for fault-tolerant quantum computation. The error threshold of this code matches what can be achieved with random codes (hashing) for \emph{every} single-qubit Pauli noise channel; it is the first explicit code shown to have this universal property. We present numerical evidence that the threshold even exceeds this hashing bound for an experimentally relevant range of noise parameters. Focusing on the common situation where qubit dephasing is the dominant noise, we show that this code has a practical, high-performance decoder and surpasses all previously known thresholds in the realistic setting where syndrome measurements are unreliable. We go on to demonstrate the favorable sub-threshold resource scaling that can be obtained by specializing a code to exploit structure in the noise. We show that it is possible to maintain all of these advantages when we perform fault-tolerant quantum computation. We finally suggest some small-scale experiments that could exploit noise bias to reduce qubit overhead in two-dimensional architectures. The complete version of this paper can be found at https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.07851. |
|||
| Pauli error estimation via Population Recovery | TQC 2021 | regular | Ryan O’Donnell |
| The XZZX Surface Code | TQC 2021 | regular | Pablo Bonilla, David Tuckett, Stephen Bartlett, Benjamin Brown |
| Robust shadow estimation | TQC 2021 | regular | Senrui Chen, Wenjun Yu, Pei Zeng |
| High thresholds from symmetries of quantum codes | QIP 2020 | regular | Stephen Bartlett, Sergey Bravyi, Benjamin Brown, Christopher Chubb, Andrew Darmawan, David Tuckett, Dominic Williamson |
| Multi-qubit Randomized Benchmarking Using Few Samples | TQC 2017 | regular | Jonas Helsen, Joel Wallman, Stephanie Wehner |
| Practical characterization of quantum devices without tomography | QIP 2012 | regular | Marcus P. Da Silva, Olivier Landon-Cardinal, Yi-Kai Liu, David Poulin |
| Phase transition of computational power in the resource states for one-way quantum computation | QIP 2008 | regular | ▸Dan Browne, Matthew Elliot, Seth Merkel, Akimasa Miyake, Anthony Short |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2021 | SC | member | — |
| TQC 2020 | PC | chair | Chair |
| TQC 2019 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2018 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2015 | Local | member | — |
| QIP 2014 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Benjamin Brown | 3 |
| David Tuckett | 3 |
| Stephen Bartlett | 3 |
| Adrian Chapman | 2 |
| Jonathan Conrad | 2 |
| Liang Jiang | 2 |
| Senrui Chen | 2 |
| Akimasa Miyake | 1 |
| Andrew Darmawan | 1 |
| Ansgar Burchards | 1 |
| Anthony Short | 1 |
| Christopher Chubb | 1 |
| Dan Browne | 1 |
| David Huse | 1 |
| David Poulin | 1 |
| Dominic Williamson | 1 |
| Hsin-Yuan Huang | 1 |
| Jens Eisert | 1 |
| Joel Wallman | 1 |
| John Preskill | 1 |