10
program roles
10
steering roles
1
organizing role
2
leadership roles
93
collaborators
2008–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
29 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Learning k-body Hamiltonians via compressed sensing | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Yu Tong, Muzhou Ma, John Preskill |
| Efficient self-consistent learning of gate set Pauli noise | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Senrui Chen, Zhihan Zhang, Liang Jiang |
| Fiber Bundle Fault Tolerance of GKP Codes | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Ansgar Burchards, Jonathan Conrad |
| Chasing shadows with Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes | TQC 2025 | regular | Jonathan Conrad, Jens Eisert |
| Quantum chi-squared tomography and mutual information testing | QIP 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Ryan O'Donnell |
| A Constructive Approach to Zauner's Conjecture via the Stark Conjectures | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Marcus Appleby, Gene Kopp |
| Free fermions behind the disguise | QIP 2022 | regular | Samuel Elman, ▸Adrian Chapman |
| Learning from noisy quantum experiments | QIP 2022 | regular | ▸Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, John Preskill |
| Averaged Circuit Eigenvalue Sampling | TQC 2022 | regular ▸ presenter | — |
| Quantum coding with low-depth random circuits | QIP 2021 | regular | Michael Gullans, Stefan Krastanov, David Huse, Liang Jiang |
Abstract Random quantum circuits have played a central role in establishing the computational advantages of near-term quantum computers over their conventional counterparts. Here, we use ensembles of low-depth random circuits with local connectivity in D spatial dimensions to generate quantum error-correcting codes. For random stabilizer codes and the erasure channel, we find strong evidence that a depth O(logN) random circuit is necessary and sufficient to converge (with high probability) to zero failure probability for any finite amount below the channel capacity for any D. Previous results on random circuits have only shown that O(N^1/D) depth suffices or that O(log^3 N) depth suffices for all-to-all connectivity. We then study the critical behavior of the erasure threshold in the so-called moderate deviation limit, where both the failure probability and the distance to the channel capacity converge to zero with N. We find that the requisite depth scales like O(log N) only for dimensions D=2, and that random circuits require O(N^1/2) depth for D=1. Finally, we introduce an "expurgation" algorithm that uses quantum measurements to remove logical operators that cause the code to fail by turning them into either additional stabilizers or into gauge operators in a subsystem code. With such targeted measurements, we can achieve sub-logarithmic depth in D=2 spatial dimensions below capacity without increasing the maximum weight of the check operators. We find that for any rate beneath the capacity, high-performing codes with thousands of logical qubits are achievable with depth 4-8 expurgated random circuits in D=2 dimensions. These results indicate that finite-rate quantum codes are practically relevant for near-term devices and may significantly reduce the resource requirements to achieve fault tolerance for near-term applications. |
|||
| Characterization of solvable spin models via graph invariants | QIP 2021 | regular | Adrian Chapman |
Abstract Exactly solvable models are essential in physics. For many-body spin-1/2 systems, an important class of such models consists of those that can be mapped to free fermions hopping on a graph. We provide a complete characterization of models which can be solved this way. Specifically, we reduce the problem of recognizing such spin models to the graph-theoretic problem of recognizing line graphs, which has been solved optimally. A corollary of our result is a complete set of constant-sized commutation structures that constitute the obstructions to a free-fermion solution. We find that symmetries are tightly constrained in these models. Pauli symmetries correspond to either: (i) cycles on the fermion hopping graph, (ii) the fermion parity operator, or (iii) logically encoded qubits. Clifford symmetries within one of these symmetry sectors, with three exceptions, must be symmetries of the free-fermion model itself. We demonstrate how several exact free-fermion solutions from the literature fit into our formalism and give an explicit example of a new model previously unknown to be solvable by free fermions |
|||
| 10:00 - 10:30 | The XZZX surface code | QIP 2021 | regular | Pablo Bonilla Ataides, David Tuckett, Stephen D. Bartlett, Benjamin Brown |
Abstract We show that a variant of the surface code---the XZZX code---offers remarkable performance for fault-tolerant quantum computation. The error threshold of this code matches what can be achieved with random codes (hashing) for \emph{every} single-qubit Pauli noise channel; it is the first explicit code shown to have this universal property. We present numerical evidence that the threshold even exceeds this hashing bound for an experimentally relevant range of noise parameters. Focusing on the common situation where qubit dephasing is the dominant noise, we show that this code has a practical, high-performance decoder and surpasses all previously known thresholds in the realistic setting where syndrome measurements are unreliable. We go on to demonstrate the favorable sub-threshold resource scaling that can be obtained by specializing a code to exploit structure in the noise. We show that it is possible to maintain all of these advantages when we perform fault-tolerant quantum computation. We finally suggest some small-scale experiments that could exploit noise bias to reduce qubit overhead in two-dimensional architectures. The complete version of this paper can be found at https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.07851. |
|||
| Robust shadow estimation | TQC 2021 | regular | ▸Senrui Chen, Wenjun Yu, Pei Zeng |
| Pauli Error Estimation via Population Recovery | TQC 2021 | regular | Ryan O'Donnell |
| The XZZX Surface Code | TQC 2021 | regular | ▸Pablo Bonilla, David Tuckett, Stephen D. Bartlett, Benjamin Brown |
| High thresholds from symmetries of quantum codes | QIP 2020 | regular | Stephen D. Bartlett, Sergey Bravyi, Benjamin Brown, Christopher T. Chubb, Andrew Darmawan, David Tuckett, Dominic Williamson |
| Efficient learning of Pauli channels | QIP 2019 | regular ▸ presenter | Joel Wallman |
| Efficient learning of Pauli channels | TQC 2019 | regular | Joel Wallman |
| Statistical mechanical models for correlated noise in arbitrary stabiliser codes | TQC 2018 | regular | Christopher T. Chubb |
| Debugging the next generation of quantum devices | QIP 2017 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
| Limits on the storage of quantum information in a volume of space | TQC 2017 | regular | Jeongwan Haah, Michael Kastoryano, Isaac Kim |
| Approximate symmetries of Hamiltonians | TQC 2017 | regular | Christopher T. Chubb |
| Multi-qubit Randomized Benchmarking Using Few Samples | TQC 2017 | regular | Jonas Helsen, Joel Wallman, Stephanie Wehner |
| Randomized Benchmarking with Confidence | QIP 2015 | regular | Joel Wallman |
| Practical characterization of quantum devices without tomography | QIP 2012 | regular | Marcus P. Da Silva, Olivier Landon-Cardinal, Yi-Kai Liu, David Poulin |
|
Adiabatic gate teleportation ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | David Bacon |
|
Non-commutative compressed sensing: theory and applications for quantum tomography ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | David Gross, Yi-Kai Liu, Stephen Becker, Jens Eisert |
| Most quantum states are useless for measurement-based quantum computation | QIP 2009 | regular ▸ presenter | David Gross, Jens Eisert, Michael Bremner, Andreas Winter, Caterina Mora |
| Phase transition of computational power in the resource states for one-way quantum computation | QIP 2008 | regular | ▸Dan Browne, Matthew Elliot, Seth Merkel, Akimasa Miyake, Anthony Short |
27 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum Phaselift | TQC 2026 | Dhrumil Patel, Laura Clinton, Raul Garcia-Patron |
Estimating quantum time-series such as the Loschmidt echo $f(t)=\langle\psi|\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}Ht}|\psi\rangle$ is central to spectroscopy and Hamiltonian analysis. Direct estimation via the Hadamard test requires controlled implementations of $\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}Ht}$, and the depth of these controlled circuits grows with $t$, making long-time estimation challenging on near-term hardware. Inspired by the classical Phaselift approach to phase retrieval, we introduce Quantum Phaselift, a lifting-based framework that estimates the rank-one matrix $Z = f f^\dagger$ sampled at discrete times instead of $f$ directly. We propose quantum circuits for estimating the entries of $Z$ and prove that measuring only a narrow band of this matrix around the diagonal provides sufficient data for unique signal reconstruction. This reformulation reduces the depth of required controlled circuits to scale with the width of the measured band, rather than with the total evolution time. We then show that generic signals can be recovered from a band of width $O(1)$, providing a substantial savings in controlled operations compared to naïve algorithms. We develop three robust estimators to recover the signal from the noisy measurements of the entries on this narrow band: a block-by-block algebraic estimator, a block-by-block eigenvector estimator, and a least-squares estimator. We rigorously prove exact recovery for all three estimators in the noiseless setting and establish stability guarantees and sample complexity bounds for the block-by-block algebraic estimator in the presence of measurement noise. Finally, we numerically demonstrate that high-quality signal recovery is possible for the 2D Fermi-Hubbard and 2D transverse-field Ising model time-series with more than 100 points using only a few million samples and reasonable post-processing time, making our recovery techniques efficient and effective for near-term implementations. |
||
| Autonomous Hamiltonian certification and change-point detection | TQC 2026 | Dmitrii Khitrin, Muzhou Ma, Jamie Sikora, Yu Tong, Alice Zheng |
Modern quantum devices require high-precision Hamiltonian dynamics, but environmental noise can cause calibrated Hamiltonian parameters to drift over time, necessitating expensive recalibration. Detecting when recalibration is needed is challenging, especially since the very gates required for sophisticated verification protocols may themselves be miscalibrated. While cloud quantum computing services implement heuristic routines for triggering recalibration, the fundamental limits of optimal recalibration have yet to be illuminated. Here we study the recalibration problem by developing efficient Hamiltonian certification and \changepoint{} detection protocols in the \emph{autonomous} setting. In this setting we use only single-qubit gates and measurements and do not use any ancilla qubits, making the protocols robust to the calibration issues for multi-qubit operations they aim to detect. For an unknown $n$-qubit $M$-sparse Hamiltonian $H$, our certification protocol distinguishes whether $\|H - H_0\|_F \geq \epsilon$ or $\|H - H_0\|_F \leq O(\epsilon/\sqrt{n})$ with sample complexity $\mathcal{O}(nM^2\ln(1/\delta)/\epsilon^2)$ and total evolution time $\mathcal{O}(nM\ln(1/\delta)/\epsilon^2)$, where $H_0$ is the target Hamiltonian and $\delta$ bounds the failure probability. The protocol achieves this by evolving random stabilizer product states and performing adaptive single-qubit measurements based on a classically simulable hypothesis state. Extending this to continuous monitoring, we develop an online \changepoint{} detection algorithm using the CUSUM procedure that achieves a detection delay bound of $\mathcal{O}(nM\ln(M\falsealarm{T})/\epsilon^2)$, matching the known asymptotically optimal scaling with respect to false alarm run length $\falsealarm{T}$. Our approach enables quantum devices to autonomously monitor their own calibration status without requiring ancillary systems, entangling operations, or a trusted reference device, and provides maximum-likelihood estimates of \changepoint{} locations to identify and rerun affected computations, offering a practical solution for robust quantum computing with contemporary noisy devices. |
||
| Fragile boundaries of tailored surface codes and improved decoding of circuit-level noise | QIP 2023 | Oscar Higgott, Thomas Bohdanowicz, Aleksander Kubica, Earl Campbell |
| Fast Estimation of Sparse Quantum Noise | QIP 2021 | Robin Harper, Wenjun Yu |
| Robust shadow estimation | QIP 2021 | Senrui Chen, Wenjun Yu, Pei Zeng |
| Statistical mechanical models for quantum codes with correlated noise | QIP 2019 | Christopher T. Chubb |
| Stochastic Estimation of Dynamical Variables | TQC 2019 | Stefan Krastanov, Sisi Zhou, Liang Jiang |
| Ultra-high error threshold for surface codes with biased noise | QIP 2018 | David Tuckett, Stephen D. Bartlett |
| Explaining quantum correlations through evolution of causal models | QIP 2017 | Robin Harper, Robert Chapman, Christopher Ferrie, Christopher E. Granade, Richard Kueng, Daniel Naoumenko, Alberto Peruzzo |
| Limits on the storage of quantum information in a volume of space | QIP 2017 | Jeongwan Haah, Michael Kastoryano, Isaac Kim |
| Detecting Topological Order with Ribbon Operators | QIP 2017 | Jacob Bridgeman, David Poulin |
| Approximate symmetries of Hamiltonians | QIP 2017 | Christopher T. Chubb |
| Detecting Topological Order with Ribbon Operators | TQC 2017 | Jacob Bridgeman, David Poulin |
| Ribbon operators in topologically ordered 2D spin systems | QIP 2015 | Jacob Bridgeman, Eric Huang, David Poulin |
| Modelling Quantum Fields with Detector interactions using Continuous Matrix Product States | QIP 2015 | Nicholas Funai, Nicolas Menicucci |
| Polynomial-time degenerate ground state approximation of gapped 1D Hamiltonians | QIP 2015 | Christopher T. Chubb |
| Quantum Error Correction for Non-Abelian Anyons | QIP 2014 | Courtney Brell, Simon Burton, Guillaume Dauphinais, David Poulin |
| Error Correction in a Fibonacci Fusion Code | QIP 2014 | Simon Burton, Courtney Brell |
| A Restricted Isometry Theorem for Pauli Measurements, and the Sample Complexity of Tomography | QIP 2013 | Yi-Kai Liu, David Gross, Jens Eisert |
| Graphical calculus for Gaussian pure states | QIP 2012 | Nicolas Menicucci, Peter Van Loock |
| Computational complexity of computing the density of states | QIP 2011 | Brielin Brown, Norbert Schuch |
| Toric codes and quantum doubles from two-body Hamiltonians | QIP 2011 | Courtney Brell, Stephen D. Bartlett, Andrew Doherty |
| Adiabatic topological quantum computing with surface codes | QIP 2011 | Chris Cesare, David Bacon, Andrew Landahl, Alice Neels |
| Topological Entanglement Renyi Entropy | QIP 2010 | Alioscia Hamma, Taylor Hughes, Xiao-Gang Wen |
| Heralded polynomial-time quantum state tomography | QIP 2009 | Stephen D. Bartlett, David Gross, Rolando Somma |
| One-Way Quantum Computing in the Optical Frequency Comb | QIP 2009 | Nicolas Menicucci, Olivier Pfister |
| Quantum metrology from an information theory perspective | QIP 2009 | Anil Shaji, Alexandre B. Tacla, Animesh Datta, Sergio Boixo, Carlton Caves, Matthew Davis |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2025 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2024 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2024 | steering | member | — |
| TQC 2024 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | steering | member | — |
| TQC 2023 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2022 | steering | member | — |
| TQC 2022 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2021 | steering | member | — |
| TQC 2021 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2020 | steering | member | — |
| TQC 2020 | program | chair | — |
| QIP 2019 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2019 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2018 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2016 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2015 | organizing | member | — |
| QIP 2014 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2014 | program | co_chair | — |
| TQC 2011 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Christopher T. Chubb | 6 |
| Stephen D. Bartlett | 6 |
| David Poulin | 5 |
| David Gross | 4 |
| David Tuckett | 4 |
| Jens Eisert | 4 |
| Joel Wallman | 4 |
| Benjamin Brown | 3 |
| Courtney Brell | 3 |
| Jacob Bridgeman | 3 |
| Liang Jiang | 3 |
| Nicolas Menicucci | 3 |
| Senrui Chen | 3 |
| Wenjun Yu | 3 |
| Yi-Kai Liu | 3 |
| Adrian Chapman | 2 |
| David Bacon | 2 |
| Isaac Kim | 2 |
| Jeongwan Haah | 2 |
| John Preskill | 2 |