1
talks
1
posters
0
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2018–2023
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-field entanglement distribution over a 96 km submarine optical fibre | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | ▸Soeren Wengerowsky, Siddarth Koduru Joshi, Fabian Steinlechner, Julien R. Zichi, Sergiy M. Dobrovolsky, René van der Molen, Johannes W. N. Los, Marijn A. M. Versteegh, Alberto Mura, Davide Calonico, Massimo Inguscio, Hannes Hübel, Anton Zeilinger, André Xuereb, Rupert Ursin |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Time-resolved Quantum Key Distribution using Semiconductor Quantum Dots with Oscillating Photonic States | QCRYPT 2023 | Matteo Pennacchietti, Brady Cunard, Mohd Zeeshan, Shlok Nahar, Sayan Gangopadhyay, Philip J. Poole, Dan Dalacu, Andreas Fognini, Klaus Jöns, Thomas Jennewein, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Michael E. Reimer |
Quantum dot-based entangled photon sources are promising candidates for quantum key distribution (QKD), as they can in principle emit deterministically, with high brightness and low multiphoton contribution. However, quantum dots (QD) often inherently possess a fine structure splitting (FSS). Since the entangled photonic state in the presence of non-zero FSS is oscillating, one must settle for a lower efficiency source through temporal post-selection or a lower measured entanglement fidelity. In both cases, the overall key rate is reduced.
Our QKD analysis shows that this trade-off can be overcome by constructing a time-resolved QKD protocol where all photon pairs emitted by a QD with non-zero FSS can be used in secret key generation. This protocol works only when the detection system's temporal resolution is much smaller than the FSS period. By implementing our protocol, higher key rates can be achieved as compared to previous QKD experiments with QD entangled photon pair sources.
Additionally, unlike previous security analyses that assume perfect qubit states, we rigorously bound the effect of any multi-photon components of the optical state on the key rate, which is more applicable to practical implementations. |
||
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Alberto Mura | 1 |
| Andreas Fognini | 1 |
| André Xuereb | 1 |
| Anton Zeilinger | 1 |
| Brady Cunard | 1 |
| Dan Dalacu | 1 |
| Davide Calonico | 1 |
| Fabian Steinlechner | 1 |
| Hannes Hübel | 1 |
| Johannes W. N. Los | 1 |
| Julien R. Zichi | 1 |
| Klaus Jöns | 1 |
| Marijn A. M. Versteegh | 1 |
| Massimo Inguscio | 1 |
| Matteo Pennacchietti | 1 |
| Michael E. Reimer | 1 |
| Mohd Zeeshan | 1 |
| Norbert Lütkenhaus | 1 |
| Philip J. Poole | 1 |
| René van der Molen | 1 |