17
collaborators
2024–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
5 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Gate Teleportation vs Circuit Cutting in Distributed Quantum Computing | TQC 2026 | Daniel Dilley, Shobhit Gupta, Nikolay Sheshko, Manish K. Singh, Zain Saleem |
Distributed quantum computing offers a path to scaling beyond the limits of single-chip processors by using either nonlocal teleported CNOT gates or classical circuit-cutting techniques. Circuit cutting is flexible but incurs exponential sampling and post-processing overhead, whereas remote gates avoid this cost but require high-fidelity Bell pairs generated over optical links. Using a physically motivated model of noisy microwave-to-optical transducers, we identify the noise regimes in which remote gates match or exceed the performance of gate cutting for distributed GHZ-state generation. These results establish concrete hardware targets for optical interconnects and support a hybrid approach that combines quantum links with circuit cutting in near-term modular architectures. |
||
| A matching decomposition algorithm for simulating quantum walk Hamiltonians | TQC 2026 | Mostafa Atallah, Daniel Dilley, Igor Gaidai, Zain Saleem, Rebekah Herrman |
In this work, we present a new algorithm for generating quantum circuits that efficiently implement continuous time quantum walks on arbitrary simple sparse graphs. The algorithm, called matching decomposition, works by decomposing a continuous-time quantum walk Hamiltonian into a collection of exactly implementable Hamiltonians corresponding to matchings in the underlying graph followed by a novel graph compression algorithm that merges edges in the graph. Lastly, we convert the walks to a circuit and Trotterize over these components. The dynamics of the walker on each edge in the matching can be implemented in the circuit model as sequences of CX and CRx gates. We do not use Pauli decomposition when implementing walks along each matching. Furthermore, we compare matching decomposition to a standard Pauli-based simulation pipeline and find that matching decomposition consistently yields substantial resource reductions, requiring up to 43% fewer controlled gates and up to 54% shallower circuits than Pauli decomposition across multiple graph families. Finally, we also present examples and theoretical results for when matching decomposition can exactly simulate a continuous-time quantum walk on a graph. |
||
| Quantum Advantage in Distributed Sensing with Noisy Quantum Networks | QIP 2025 | Allen Zang, Alexander Kolar, Joaquin Chung, Stephen K. Gray, Rajkumar Kettimuthu, Tian Zhong, Zain Saleem |
| Classical simulators as quantum error mitigators via circuit cutting | QIP 2024 | Ji Liu, Zain Saleem |
| Fault Tolerant Quantum Error Mitigation | TQC 2024 | Anjala M Babu, Ji Liu, Zain Saleem, Mark Byrd |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Zain Saleem | 5 |
| Daniel Dilley | 2 |
| Ji Liu | 2 |
| Alexander Kolar | 1 |
| Allen Zang | 1 |
| Anjala M Babu | 1 |
| Igor Gaidai | 1 |
| Joaquin Chung | 1 |
| Manish K. Singh | 1 |
| Mark Byrd | 1 |
| Mostafa Atallah | 1 |
| Nikolay Sheshko | 1 |
| Rajkumar Kettimuthu | 1 |
| Rebekah Herrman | 1 |
| Shobhit Gupta | 1 |
| Stephen K. Gray | 1 |
| Tian Zhong | 1 |