6
collaborators
2024–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
5 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Directional Codes: a new family of quantum LDPC codes on hexagonal- and square-grid connectivity hardware | QIP 2026 | ▸David Byfield, Archibald Ruban |
| Directional Codes: a new family of quantum LDPC codes on hexagonal- and square-grid connectivity hardware | TQC 2026 | David Byfield, Archibald Ruban |
Utility-scale quantum computing requires quantum error correction (QEC) to protect quantum information against noise. Currently, superconducting hardware is a promising candidate for achieving fault tolerance due to its fast gate times and feasible scalability. However, it is often restricted to two-dimensional nearest-neighbour connectivity, which is thought to be incapable of accommodating high-rate quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes that promise to greatly reduce the number of physical qubits needed to encode logical qubits. In this paper we construct a new family of qLDPC codes, which we call ``Directional Codes'', that outperforms the rotated planar code (RPC) while naturally meeting the connectivity requirements of the widely adopted square-grid, and some even the sparser hexagonal-grid. The key idea is to utilise the iSWAP gate -- a natural native gate for superconducting qubits -- to construct circuits that measure the stabilisers of these qLDPC codes without the need for any long-range connections or an increased degree of connectivity. We numerically evaluate the performance of directional codes, encoding twelve logical qubits, using a common superconducting-inspired circuit-level Pauli noise model. We also compare them to the RPC and to the bivariate bicycle (BB) codes, currently the two most popular quantum LDPC code families. As a concrete example, directional codes outperform the RPC by achieving approximately the same logical error probability at physical error rate $p=10^{-3}$ using only $18.75-25\%$ of the physical qubits at distance up to $8$. Our discovery represents a breakthrough in QEC code design that suggests complex long-range, high-connectivity hardware may not be necessary for low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computation. |
||
| Accommodating fabrication defects on Floquet codes with minimal hardware requirements | QIP 2025 | Campbell McLauchlan, Alexandra Moylett |
| To reset, or not to reset — that is the question | TQC 2025 | — |
| Tangling schedules eases hardware connectivity requirements for quantum error correction | TQC 2024 | Ophelia Crawford, Earl Campbell |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Archibald Ruban | 2 |
| David Byfield | 2 |
| Alexandra Moylett | 1 |
| Campbell McLauchlan | 1 |
| Earl Campbell | 1 |
| Ophelia Crawford | 1 |