23
collaborators
2021–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
1 Talk
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nonlocality of Quantum States Can be Transitive ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular ▸ presenter | Gelo Noel Tabia, Chung-Yun Hsieh, Yu-Chun Yin, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
As a striking manifestation of quantum entanglement, nonlocality has long played a pivotal role in shaping our understanding of the quantum world. When considering a Bell test involving three parties, we may even find a remarkable situation where the nonlocality in two bipartite subsystems forces the remaining bipartite subsystem to exhibit nonlocality. This intriguing effect, dubbed nonlocality transitivity, was first identified in the non-quantum non-signaling world in 2011. However, whether such transitivity could manifest within quantum theory has remained unresolved—until now. Here, we provide the first affirmative answer to this open problem at the level of quantum states, thereby showing that there exists a quantum-realizable notion of nonlocality transitivity. Specifically, by leveraging the possibility of Bell-inequality violation by tensoring, we analytically construct a pair of nonlocal bipartite states such that simultaneously realizing them in a tripartite system induces nonlocality in the remaining bipartite subsystem. En route to showing this, we also prove that multiple copies of the W-state marginals uniquely determine the global compatible state, thus establishing another instance when the parts determine the whole. Surprisingly, the nonlocality transitivity of quantum states also occurs among the reduced states of Haar-random three-qutrit pure states. We further show that the transitivity of quantum steering can already be demonstrated with the marginals of a three-qubit W state, showing again another noteworthy difference between the two forms of quantum correlations. Finally, we present a simple method to construct quantum states and correlations that are nonlocal in all their non-unipartite marginals, which may be of independent interest. |
|||
16 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Device-Independent Conference Key Agreement with Two Measurement Bases | QCRYPT 2026 | Ranendu Adhikary, Subhankar Bera, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
Conference key agreement allows multiple parties to establish a shared secret key. Device-independent protocols are especially attractive because their security can be certified from observed correlations, without trusting the internal behavior of the devices. We propose a tripartite device-independent conference key agreement protocol using only two measurement bases on a shared GHZ state. Under suitable structural conditions, the maximal violation of a chosen Bell inequality self-tests the target GHZ strategy with Pauli measurements, ensuring ideal security. We also prove robust self-testing, showing that near-maximal violation guarantees nontrivial fidelity with the ideal strategy under realistic noise. |
||
| Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution in the Minimal Bell Scenario | QCRYPT 2026 | Jaskaran Singh, Subhankar Bera, Gelo Noel Tabia, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
Device-independent quantum key distribution allows two distant parties to certify a secret key directly from the correlations observed in an experiment, without relying on a detailed model of the devices. In this work, we study this task in the minimal Bell scenario, where each party has only two measurement choices and two possible outcomes. We show that secure key generation can be certified in this simplest setting by using tailored Bell inequalities together with simple constraints on the observed probabilities. In particular, we identify a family of quantum correlations that enables perfect key generation in a spot-checking protocol. The security follows from a self-testing property: the observed data certify the relevant quantum state and measurements, and hence certify that the adversary has no information about the generated key. Our results show that maximal device-independent key generation is possible in the minimal Bell scenario, even for arbitrarily small Bell non-locality. This highlights the importance of using the full structure of the observed correlations, rather than only a single Bell-inequality value, for certifying device-independent quantum key distribution. |
||
| Large Parts are Generically Entangled Across All Cuts | QIP 2026 | Mu-En Liu, Chung-Yun Hsieh, Gelo Noel Tabia, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Hardy-type paradoxes for an arbitrary symmetric bipartite Bell scenario | QIP 2024 | Shiladitya Mal, Gelo Noel Tabia, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Generic entanglement transitivity from two-qudit marginals of three-qudit pure states | QIP 2024 | Mu-En Liu, Gelo Noel Tabia, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Device-independent certification of desirable properties with a confidence interval | QIP 2024 | Wan-Guan Chang, Kai-Chun Chen, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Incorporating Zero-Probability Constraints to Device-Independent Randomness Certification | QIP 2024 | Chun-Yu Chen, Kai-Min Chung, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Gelo Noel Tabia |
| Bounding the minimal average communication cost of nonlocal correlations | QIP 2024 | Swati Kumari, Gelo Noel Tabia, Bo-An Tsai, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Symmetry and asymmetry in Bell-inequality violation | QIP 2024 | Hsin-Yu Hsu, Gelo Noel Tabia, Bo-An Tsai, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Symmetric and asymmetric strategies for Bell-inequality violation | TQC 2024 | Hsin-Yu Hsu, Gelo Noel Tabia, Bo-An Tasi, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Quantum correlations on the no-signaling boundary: self-testing and more | QIP 2023 | Gelo Noel Tabia, Jebaratnam Chellasamy, Shiladitya Mal, Jun-Yi Wu, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Entanglement transitivity problems | QIP 2023 | Gelo Noel Tabia, Chung-Yun Hsieh, Yu-Chun Yin, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Quantum correlations on the no-signaling boundary: self-testing and more | TQC 2023 | Gelo Noel Tabia, Chellasamy Jebarathinam, Shiladitya Mal, Jun-Yi Wu, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Local randomness from quantum correlations on the no-signaling-boundary | TQC 2023 | Chun-Yu Chen, Gelo Noel Tabia, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Self-testing quantum correlations on the no-signaling boundary | QCRYPT 2022 | Jun-Yi Wu, Gelo Noel Tabia, Jebarathinam Chellasamy, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Shiladitya Mal |
| When quantum boundary meets the non-signaling boundary | TQC 2021 | Jun-Yi Wu, Gelo Noel Tabia, Pei-Sheng Lin, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Yeong-Cherng Liang | 17 |
| Gelo Noel Tabia | 15 |
| Jun-Yi Wu | 4 |
| Shiladitya Mal | 4 |
| Chung-Yun Hsieh | 3 |
| Bo-An Tsai | 2 |
| Chun-Yu Chen | 2 |
| Hsin-Yu Hsu | 2 |
| Mu-En Liu | 2 |
| Subhankar Bera | 2 |
| Yu-Chun Yin | 2 |
| Bo-An Tasi | 1 |
| Chellasamy Jebarathinam | 1 |
| Jaskaran Singh | 1 |
| Jebarathinam Chellasamy | 1 |
| Jebaratnam Chellasamy | 1 |
| Kai-Chun Chen | 1 |
| Kai-Min Chung | 1 |
| Min-Hsiu Hsieh | 1 |
| Pei-Sheng Lin | 1 |