11
collaborators
2023–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
2 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Efficient Non-Adaptive Quantum Algorithms for Tolerant Junta Testing ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular ▸ presenter | Yuxuan Liu, Penghui Yao, Zekun Ye, Jialin Zhang |
We consider the problem of deciding whether an $n$-qubit unitary (or $n$-bit Boolean function) is $\varepsilon_1$-close to some $k$-junta or $\varepsilon_2$-far from every $k$-junta, where $k$-junta unitaries act non-trivially on at most $k$ qubits and as the identity on the rest, and $k$-junta Boolean functions depend on at most $k$ variables. For constant numbers $\varepsilon_1,\varepsilon_2$ such that $0 < \varepsilon_1 < \varepsilon_2 < 1$, we show the following. 1. A non-adaptive $O(k\log k)$-query tolerant $(\varepsilon_1,\varepsilon_2)$-tester for $k$-junta unitaries when $2\sqrt{2}\varepsilon_1 < \varepsilon_2$. 2. A non-adaptive tolerant $(\varepsilon_1,\varepsilon_2)$-tester for Boolean functions with $O(k \log k)$ quantum queries when $4\varepsilon_1 < \varepsilon_2$. 3. A $2^{\widetilde{O}(k)}$-query tolerant $(\varepsilon_1,\varepsilon_2)$-tester for $k$-junta unitaries for any $\varepsilon_1,\varepsilon_2$. The first algorithm provides an exponential improvement over the best-known quantum algorithms [CLL24, ADG25]. The second algorithm shows an exponential quantum advantage over any non-adaptive classical algorithm [CDL+25]. The third tester gives the first tolerant junta unitary testing result for an arbitrary gap. Besides, we adapt the first two quantum algorithms to be implemented using only single-qubit operations, thereby enhancing experimental feasibility, with a slightly more stringent requirement for the parameter gap. |
|||
| Clifford testing: algorithms and lower bounds | TQC 2026 | regular | Marcel Hinsche, ▸Philippe van Dordrecht, Jens Eisert, Jop Briët, Jonas Helsen |
We consider the problem of Clifford testing, which asks whether a black-box $n$-qubit unitary is a Clifford unitary or at least $\varepsilon$-far from every Clifford unitary. We give the first 4-query Clifford tester, which decides this problem with probability~$\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)$. This contrasts with the minimum of 6 copies required for the closely-related task of stabilizer testing. We show that our tester is tolerant, by adapting techniques from tolerant stabilizer testing to our setting. In doing so, we settle in the positive a conjecture of Bu, Gu and Jaffe, by proving a polynomial inverse theorem for a non-commutative Gowers 3-uniformity norm. We also consider the restricted setting of single-copy access, where we give an $O(n)$-query Clifford tester that requires no auxiliary memory qubits or adaptivity. We complement this with a lower bound, proving that any such, potentially adaptive, single-copy algorithm needs at least $\Omega(n^{1/4})$ queries. To obtain our results, we leverage the structure of the commutant of the Clifford group, obtaining several technical statements that may be of independent interest. |
|||
3 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Tolerant testing of stabilizer states with a polynomial gap via a generalized uncertainty relation | TQC 2025 | — |
| Quantum Hypercontractive Inequalities and Their Applications in Common Randomness Generation | TQC 2024 | Yangjing Dong, Fengning Ou, Penghui Yao |
| Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Testing and Learning Quantum Junta Channels | TQC 2023 | Penghui Yao |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Penghui Yao | 3 |
| Fengning Ou | 1 |
| Jens Eisert | 1 |
| Jialin Zhang | 1 |
| Jonas Helsen | 1 |
| Jop Briët | 1 |
| Marcel Hinsche | 1 |
| Philippe van Dordrecht | 1 |
| Yangjing Dong | 1 |
| Yuxuan Liu | 1 |
| Zekun Ye | 1 |