1
program role
27
collaborators
2023–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
5 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
The abelian state hidden subgroup problem: Learning stabilizer groups and beyond ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular ▸ presenter | Jose Carrasco, Jens Eisert |
Identifying the symmetry properties of quantum states is a central theme in quantum information theory and quantum many-body physics. In this work, we investigate quantum learning problems in which the goal is to identify a hidden symmetry of an unknown quantum state. Building on the recent formulation of the state hidden subgroup problem (StateHSP), we focus on abelian groups and develop an efficient quantum algorithm that learns any hidden symmetry subgroup using a generalized form of Fourier sampling. We showcase the versatility of the approach in three concrete applications: These are learning (i) qubit and qudit stabilizer groups, (ii) cuts along which a state is unentangled, and (iii) hidden translation symmetries. Through these applications, we reveal that well-known quantum learning primitives, such as Bell sampling and Bell difference sampling, are in fact special cases of Fourier sampling. Our results highlight the broad potential of the StateHSP framework for symmetry-based quantum learning tasks. |
|||
| Will it glue? On short-depth designs beyond the unitary group | TQC 2026 | regular | ▸Lorenzo Grevink, Jonas Haferkamp, Markus Heinrich, Jonas Helsen, Thomas Schuster, Zoltan Zimboras |
We study the formation of short-depth designs beyond the unitary group. We provide a range of results on several groups of broad interest in quantum information science: the Clifford group, the orthogonal group, the unitary symplectic groups, and the matchgate group. For all of these groups, we prove that analogues of unitary designs cannot be generated by any circuit ensemble with light-cones that are smaller than the system size. This implies linear lower bounds on the circuit depth in one-dimensional systems. For the Clifford, orthogonal, and unitary symplectic group, we moreover show that commonly considered circuit ensembles cannot generate designs in sub-linear depth on any circuit architecture. We show this by exploiting observables in the higher-order commutants of each group, which allow one to distinguish any short-depth circuit from truly random. While these no-go results rule out short-depth designs over these subgroups, we prove that slightly weaker forms of randomness---including additive-error state designs and anti-concentration in sampling distributions---nevertheless emerge at logarithmic depths in many cases. Our results reveal that the onset of randomness in shallow quantum circuits is a widespread yet subtle phenomenon, dependent on the interplay between the group itself and the context of its application. |
|||
| Clifford testing: algorithms and lower bounds | TQC 2026 | regular | Zongbo Bao, ▸Philippe van Dordrecht, Jens Eisert, Jop Briët, Jonas Helsen |
We consider the problem of Clifford testing, which asks whether a black-box $n$-qubit unitary is a Clifford unitary or at least $\varepsilon$-far from every Clifford unitary. We give the first 4-query Clifford tester, which decides this problem with probability~$\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)$. This contrasts with the minimum of 6 copies required for the closely-related task of stabilizer testing. We show that our tester is tolerant, by adapting techniques from tolerant stabilizer testing to our setting. In doing so, we settle in the positive a conjecture of Bu, Gu and Jaffe, by proving a polynomial inverse theorem for a non-commutative Gowers 3-uniformity norm. We also consider the restricted setting of single-copy access, where we give an $O(n)$-query Clifford tester that requires no auxiliary memory qubits or adaptivity. We complement this with a lower bound, proving that any such, potentially adaptive, single-copy algorithm needs at least $\Omega(n^{1/4})$ queries. To obtain our results, we leverage the structure of the commutant of the Clifford group, obtaining several technical statements that may be of independent interest. |
|||
|
Classical Verification of Quantum Learning ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Matthias C. Caro, Marios Ioannou, Alexander Nietner, Ryan Sweke |
Quantum data access and quantum processing can make certain classically intractable learning tasks feasible. However, quantum capabilities will only be available to a select few in the near future. Thus, reliable schemes that allow classical clients to delegate learning to untrusted quantum servers are required to facilitate widespread access to quantum learning advantages. Building on a recently introduced framework of interactive proof systems for classical machine learning by Goldwasser et al. (ITCS 2021), we develop a framework for classical verification of quantum learning. We exhibit learning problems that a classical learner cannot efficiently solve on their own, but that they can efficiently and reliably solve when interacting with an untrusted quantum prover. Concretely, we consider the problems of agnostic learning parities and Fourier-sparse functions with respect to distributions with uniform input marginal. We propose a new quantum data access model that we call "mixture-of-superpositions" quantum examples, based on which we give efficient quantum learning algorithms for these tasks. Moreover, we prove that agnostic quantum parity and Fourier-sparse learning can be efficiently verified by a classical verifier with only random example or statistical query access. Finally, we showcase two general scenarios in learning and verification in which quantum mixture-of-superpositions examples do not lead to sample complexity improvements over classical data. Our results demonstrate that the potential power of quantum data for learning tasks, while not unlimited, can be utilized by classical agents through interaction with untrusted quantum entities. |
|||
|
Shallow shadows: Expectation estimation using low-depth random Clifford circuits ↗
|
TQC 2023 | regular | Christian Bertoni, Jonas Haferkamp, Marios Ioannou, Jens Eisert, Hakop Pashayan |
We provide practical and powerful schemes for learning properties of a quantum state using a small number of measurements. Specifically, we present a randomized measurement scheme modulated by the depth of a random quantum circuit in one spatial dimension. This scheme interpolates between two known classical shadows schemes based on random Pauli measurements and random Clifford measurements. We focus on the regime where depth scales logarithmically in the system size and provide evidence that this retains the desirable sample complexity properties of both extremal schemes while also being experimentally feasible. We present methods for two key tasks; estimating expectation values of certain observables from generated classical shadows and, computing upper bounds on the depth-modulated shadow norm, thus providing rigorous guarantees on the accuracy of the output estimates. We achieve our findings by bringing together tools of shadow estimation, random circuits, and tensor networks. |
|||
6 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Will it glue? On short-depth designs beyond the unitary group | QIP 2026 | ▸Lorenzo Grevink, Jonas Haferkamp, Markus Heinrich, Jonas Helsen, Thomas Schuster, Zoltan Zimboras |
| Dynamic parameterized quantum circuits: expressive and barren-plateau free | QIP 2025 | Abhinav Deshpande, Sona Najafi, Kunal Sharma, Ryan Sweke, Christa Zoufal |
| Classical Verification of Quantum Learning | QIP 2024 | Matthias C. Caro, Marios Ioannou, Alexander Nietner, Ryan Sweke |
| Efficient distributed inner product estimation via Pauli sampling | TQC 2024 | Marios Ioannou, Sofiene Jerbi, Lorenzo Leone, Jens Eisert, Jose Carrasco |
| A single T-gate makes distribution learning hard | QIP 2023 | Marios Ioannou, Alexander Nietner, Ryan Sweke, Jonas Haferkamp, Yihui Quek, Dominik Hangleiter, Jean-Pierre Seifert, Jens Eisert |
| Shallow shadows: Expectation estimation using low-depth random Clifford circuits | QIP 2023 | Christian Bertoni, Jonas Haferkamp, Marios Oannou, Jens Eisert, Hakop Pashayan |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2026 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Jens Eisert | 6 |
| Jonas Haferkamp | 5 |
| Marios Ioannou | 5 |
| Ryan Sweke | 4 |
| Alexander Nietner | 3 |
| Jonas Helsen | 3 |
| Christian Bertoni | 2 |
| Hakop Pashayan | 2 |
| Jose Carrasco | 2 |
| Lorenzo Grevink | 2 |
| Markus Heinrich | 2 |
| Matthias C. Caro | 2 |
| Thomas Schuster | 2 |
| Zoltan Zimboras | 2 |
| Abhinav Deshpande | 1 |
| Christa Zoufal | 1 |
| Dominik Hangleiter | 1 |
| Jean-Pierre Seifert | 1 |
| Jop Briët | 1 |
| Kunal Sharma | 1 |