3
talks
1
posters
0
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2025–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
High-Temperature Fermionic Gibbs States are Mixtures of Gaussian States ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | Yiyi Cai, Yu Tong, Jiaqing Jiang |
Efficient simulation of a quantum system generally relies on structural properties of the quantum state. Motivated by the recent results by Bakshi et al. on the sudden death of entanglement in high-temperature Gibbs states of quantum spin systems, we study the high-temperature Gibbs states of bounded-degree local fermionic Hamiltonians, which include the special case of geometrically local fermionic systems. We prove that at a sufficiently high temperature that is independent of the system size, the Gibbs state is a probabilistic mixture of fermionic Gaussian states. This forms the basis of an efficient classical algorithm to prepare the Gibbs state by sampling from a distribution of fermionic Gaussian states. As a contrasting example, we show that high-temperature Gibbs states of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model are not convex mixtures of Gaussian states. |
|||
| Average-Case Hardness and Reducibility of Decoding Quantum Stabilizer Codes | QIP 2026 | regular | Andrey Khesin, Jonathan Z. Lu, Alexander Poremba, Yihui Quek, Peter Shor, Vinod Vaikuntanathan |
Random classical linear codes are widely believed to be hard to decode, exponentially so at constant coding rate. If the rate vanishes asymptotically sufficiently rapidly, slightly sub-exponential decoding algorithms are known. By contrast, the complexity of decoding a random quantum stabilizer code has remained an open question for quite some time. This work closes the gap in our understanding of the algorithmic hardness of decoding random quantum versus random classical codes. We prove that decoding a random stabilizer code with even a single logical qubit is at least as hard as decoding a random classical code at constant rate—the maximally hard regime. This result suggests that the easiest random quantum decoding problem is at least as hard as the hardest random classical decoding problem, and shows that any sub-exponential algorithm decoding a typical stabilizer code, at any coding rate, would immediately imply a breakthrough in cryptography.
More generally, we also characterize many other complexity-theoretic properties of stabilizer codes. While classical decoding admits a random self-reduction, we prove significant barriers for the existence of random self-reductions in the quantum case. This result follows from new bounds on Clifford entropies and Pauli mixing times, which may be of independent interest. As a complementary result, we demonstrate various other self-reductions which are in fact achievable, such as between search and decision. Our work also demonstrates several ways in which quantum phenomena, such as quantum degeneracy, force several reasonable definitions of stabilizer decoding—all of which are classically identical—to have distinct or non-trivially equivalent complexity. |
|||
| Mixing time of quantum Gibbs sampling for random sparse Hamiltonians | TQC 2025 | regular | Mehdi Soleimanifar |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Mixing time of quantum Gibbs sampling for random sparse Hamiltonians | QIP 2025 | Mehdi Soleimanifar |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Mehdi Soleimanifar | 2 |
| Alexander Poremba | 1 |
| Andrey Khesin | 1 |
| Jiaqing Jiang | 1 |
| Jonathan Z. Lu | 1 |
| Peter Shor | 1 |
| Vinod Vaikuntanathan | 1 |
| Yihui Quek | 1 |
| Yiyi Cai | 1 |
| Yu Tong | 1 |